Literature DB >> 20458581

Clinical outcomes of video-assisted skin-sparing partial mastectomy for breast cancer and immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle flap as breast-conserving therapy.

Hiroo Nakajima1, Ikuya Fujiwara, Naruhiko Mizuta, Koichi Sakaguchi, Mahiro Ohashi, Asako Nishiyama, Yoshimi Umeda, Miho Ichida, Junji Magae.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing partial mastectomy (SSPM) has yet to be investigated as a breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. We report the clinical outcomes for video-assisted SSPM (VA-SSPM) with immediate breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue.
METHODS: VA-SSPM is indicated for early-stage breast cancer arising in the upper-outer or lower-outer quadrant without skin involvement. An incision is placed along the midaxillary line, and SSPM is performed under endoscopic guidance using subcutaneous tunneling and lifting methods. Through the same incision, a latissimus dorsi muscle flap is harvested for breast reconstruction. From January 2000 to October 2007, 168 patients (Tis, n = 24; T1, n = 37; T2, n = 107) underwent VA-SSPM, and morbidity, curability, and postoperative patient satisfaction were investigated.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications included skin necrosis (2.4%, n = 4) and muscle flap necrosis (0.6%, n = 1), but no severe complications were observed. After a mean follow-up of 58.6 months, eight patients (4.8%) experienced local recurrence. Sixty-month distant metastasis-free survival rates for Tis, T1, and T2 were 100%, 97%, and 83.3%, respectively, with an overall rate of 88.4%. Furthermore, overall survival rates for Tis, T1, and T2 were 100%, 94.1%, and 94.4%, respectively, with an overall survival rate of 95% for all patients. A patient satisfaction survey showed that 81.6% of patients evaluated the surgery as "good."
CONCLUSIONS: VA-SSPM for early-stage breast cancer improves cosmetic results and achieves high patient satisfaction without increasing local or distant organ recurrence. This method offers a useful local therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20458581     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0607-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  30 in total

1.  Transareolar endoscopy-assisted partial mastectomy: a preliminary report of six cases.

Authors:  Y Tamaki; I Sakita; Y Miyoshi; M Sekimoto; S Takiguchi; M Monden; S Noguchi
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients.

Authors:  K P Benediktsson; L Perbeck
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer: risk factors and impact on distant metastases.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Komoike; Futoshi Akiyama; Yuichi Iino; Tadashi Ikeda; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Shozo Ohsumi; Mikihiro Kusama; Muneaki Sano; Eisei Shin; Kimito Suemasu; Hiroshi Sonoo; Tetsuya Taguchi; Tsunehiro Nishi; Reiki Nishimura; Shunsuke Haga; Keiichi Mise; Takayuki Kinoshita; Shigeru Murakami; Masataka Yoshimoto; Hideaki Tsukuma; Hideo Inaji
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

Authors:  Virgilio Sacchini; José A Pinotti; Alfredo C S D Barros; Alberto Luini; Alfonso Pluchinotta; Marianne Pinotti; Marcelo G Boratto; Marco D Ricci; Carlos A Ruiz; Antonio C Nisida; Paolo Veronesi; Jean Petit; Paolo Arnone; Fabio Bassi; Joseph J Disa; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; D N Danforth; K H Cowan; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; L Pierce; M E Lippman; A S Lichter; E Glatstein; P Okunieff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Late results of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  T J Meretoja; S Rasia; K A J von Smitten; S L Asko-Seljavaara; H O M Kuokkanen; T A Jahkola
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Pezner; M P Patterson; L R Hill; N Vora; K R Desai; J O Archambeau; J A Lipsett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Scientific Presentation Award. Patterns of local breast cancer recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Aislinn Vaughan; Jill R Dietz; Rebecca Aft; William E Gillanders; Timothy J Eberlein; Phoebe Freer; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  A prospective longitudinal study of cosmetic outcome in immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and the influence of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Helen Jane Thomson; Shelley Potter; Rosemary Jane Greenwood; Amit Bahl; Jane Barker; Simon John Cawthorn; Zoë Ellen Winters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  6 in total

1.  Usefulness of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroki Takahashi; Teruhiko Fujii; Shino Nakagawa; Yuka Inoue; Momoko Akashi; Uhi Toh; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Ryuji Takahashi; Miki Takenaka; Eisuke Fukuma; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Present status of endoscopic mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuhiro Owaki; Yuko Kijima; Heiji Yoshinaka; Munetsugu Hirata; Hiroshi Okumura; Simiya Ishigami; Yasuhito Nerome; Toshiro Takezaki; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 3.  Oncologic safety of conservative mastectomy in the therapeutic setting.

Authors:  John R Benson; Dorin Dumitru; Charles M Malata
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 4.  Conservative mastectomies: an overview.

Authors:  Maurizio Bruno Nava; Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Breast cancer robotic nipple sparing mastectomy: evaluation of several surgical procedures and learning curve.

Authors:  G Houvenaeghel; M Bannier; S Rua; J Barrou; M Heinemann; A Van Troy; E Lambaudie; M Cohen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Skin sparing mastectomy and robotic latissimus dorsi-flap reconstruction through a single incision.

Authors:  Gilles Houvenaeghel; Marie Bannier; Sandrine Rua; Julien Barrou; Mellie Heinemann; Eric Lambaudie; Monique Cohen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.