BACKGROUND: No consensus has been reached regarding the outcome of management of local recurrence after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. This study demonstrated the presentation, management, and outcomes of local recurrence after immediate TRAM breast reconstruction. METHODS: A comparison was conducted among 1,000 consecutive patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a pedicled TRAM flap (TRAM group) and 3,183 consecutive patients who underwent only modified radical mastectomy without reconstruction (MRM group) from January 2001 to December 2009. The presentation, treatment, and outcome including aesthetics and overall survival rate were analyzed. RESULTS: Local recurrences occurred in 18 (1.8%) patients (TRAM-LR group) who underwent TRAM breast reconstruction and 38 (1.2%) patients (MRM-LR group) who underwent MRM only (P=0.1712). Wide excision was indicated in almost all the local recurrence cases. Skin graft was required in 4 patients in the MRM-LR group, whereas only one patient required a skin graft to preserve the mound shape in the TRAM-LR group. The breast mound was maintained in all 17 patients that survived in the TRAM-LR group even after wide excision. The overall survival rate was 94.4% in the TRAM-LR group and 65.8% in the MRM-LR group (P=0.276). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence after immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction could be detected without delay and managed effectively by multiple modalities without reducing overall survival rates. Breast mound reconstruction with soft autologous tissue allowed for primary closure in most of the cases. In all of the patients who survived, the contour of their reconstructed breast remained.
BACKGROUND: No consensus has been reached regarding the outcome of management of local recurrence after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. This study demonstrated the presentation, management, and outcomes of local recurrence after immediate TRAM breast reconstruction. METHODS: A comparison was conducted among 1,000 consecutive patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a pedicled TRAM flap (TRAM group) and 3,183 consecutive patients who underwent only modified radical mastectomy without reconstruction (MRM group) from January 2001 to December 2009. The presentation, treatment, and outcome including aesthetics and overall survival rate were analyzed. RESULTS: Local recurrences occurred in 18 (1.8%) patients (TRAM-LR group) who underwent TRAM breast reconstruction and 38 (1.2%) patients (MRM-LR group) who underwent MRM only (P=0.1712). Wide excision was indicated in almost all the local recurrence cases. Skin graft was required in 4 patients in the MRM-LR group, whereas only one patient required a skin graft to preserve the mound shape in the TRAM-LR group. The breast mound was maintained in all 17 patients that survived in the TRAM-LR group even after wide excision. The overall survival rate was 94.4% in the TRAM-LR group and 65.8% in the MRM-LR group (P=0.276). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence after immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction could be detected without delay and managed effectively by multiple modalities without reducing overall survival rates. Breast mound reconstruction with soft autologous tissue allowed for primary closure in most of the cases. In all of the patients who survived, the contour of their reconstructed breast remained.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast neoplasms; Mammaplasty; Neoplasm recurrence, local
Authors: S S Kroll; A Khoo; S E Singletary; F C Ames; B G Wang; G P Reece; M J Miller; G R Evans; G L Robb Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Michael A Howard; Kristen Polo; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; David A Hidalgo; Babak Mehrara; Joseph J Disa Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Hee Jeong Kim; Eun Hwa Park; Woo Sung Lim; Jin Young Seo; Beom Suk Koh; Taik Jong Lee; Jin Sup Eom; Sung Wook Lee; Byung Ho Son; Jong Won Lee; Sei Hyun Ahn Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: L A Newman; H M Kuerer; K K Hunt; S S Kroll; F C Ames; M I Ross; B W Feig; S E Singletary Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 1998 Oct-Nov Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Alexandra H Heerdt; Jeanne A Petrek; Patrick J Borgen; David A Hidalgo Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Beatriz E Adrada; Gary J Whitman; Melissa A Crosby; Selin Carkaci; Mark J Dryden; Basak E Dogan Journal: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol Date: 2015-04-27
Authors: Claudia A Bargon; Danny A Young-Afat; Mehmet Ikinci; Assa Braakenburg; Hinne A Rakhorst; Marc A M Mureau; Helena M Verkooijen; Annemiek Doeksen Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Won Sup Yoon; Chai Hong Rim; Dae Sik Yang; Jung Ae Lee; Gil Soo Son; Young Woo Chang; Sang Uk Woo; Deok-Woo Kim; Eun-Sang Dhong Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-12