Literature DB >> 21723125

A chimpanzee recognizes synthetic speech with significantly reduced acoustic cues to phonetic content.

Lisa A Heimbauer1, Michael J Beran, Michael J Owren.   

Abstract

A long-standing debate concerns whether humans are specialized for speech perception, which some researchers argue is demonstrated by the ability to understand synthetic speech with significantly reduced acoustic cues to phonetic content. We tested a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) that recognizes 128 spoken words, asking whether she could understand such speech. Three experiments presented 48 individual words, with the animal selecting a corresponding visuographic symbol from among four alternatives. Experiment 1 tested spectrally reduced, noise-vocoded (NV) synthesis, originally developed to simulate input received by human cochlear-implant users. Experiment 2 tested "impossibly unspeechlike" sine-wave (SW) synthesis, which reduces speech to just three moving tones. Although receiving only intermittent and noncontingent reward, the chimpanzee performed well above chance level, including when hearing synthetic versions for the first time. Recognition of SW words was least accurate but improved in experiment 3 when natural words in the same session were rewarded. The chimpanzee was more accurate with NV than SW versions, as were 32 human participants hearing these items. The chimpanzee's ability to spontaneously recognize acoustically reduced synthetic words suggests that experience rather than specialization is critical for speech-perception capabilities that some have suggested are uniquely human.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723125      PMCID: PMC3143218          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  19 in total

Review 1.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Short-term reorganization of auditory analysis induced by phonetic experience.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Jeffrey R Binder; Rebecca L Piorkowski; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Marc D Hauser; Noam Chomsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-08-19

4.  The representation of noise vocoded speech in the auditory nerve of the chinchilla: physiological correlates of the perception of spectrally reduced speech.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; Robert E Wickesberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

Review 9.  Vocal learning in Grey parrots: A brief review of perception, production, and cross-species comparisons.

Authors:  Irene M Pepperberg
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Communicative signaling activates 'Broca's' homolog in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Jared P Taglialatela; Jamie L Russell; Jennifer A Schaeffer; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Empirical approaches to the study of language evolution.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-02

2.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Giraud; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A chimpanzee recognizes varied acoustical versions of sine-wave and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Lisa A Heimbauer; Michael J Beran; Michael J Owren
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Comparative Cognition: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; David A Washburn
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) name what they have seen but look first at what they have not seen.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; J David Smith; Bonnie M Perdue
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-18

6.  A longitudinal assessment of vocabulary retention in symbol-competent chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Lisa A Heimbauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Early recognition of speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Emily F Thomas
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-12-20

8.  Formant-frequency variation and informational masking of speech by extraneous formants: evidence against dynamic and speech-specific acoustical constraints.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal.

Authors:  Daniela M de la Mora; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-10-31

10.  Generalizing prosodic patterns by a non-vocal learning mammal.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.084

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.