Literature DB >> 19838652

[Surgical training using simulator. Virtual reality].

K Maschuw1, I Hassan, D K Bartsch.   

Abstract

Learning of laparoscopic operative skills is often complex and time consuming resulting in a learning curve especially for novices in surgery. Virtual reality (VR) simulation was developed as an alternative to conventional training, such as active assistance and conventional laparoscopic training with artificially perfused organs (Pop-Trainer). VR simulation enables a wide range of repeatable laparoscopic techniques in variable virtual scenarios. For abdominal surgery four different simulation systems (MIST-VR(R), LapSim, Simsurgery, Lap-Mentor) are currently available and the modules allow simulation of abstract exercises to more advanced laparoscopic procedures, such as laparoscopic sigmoid resection. The effect of VR training on laparoscopic performance and its impact on non-technical skills was evaluated using the simulator LapSim after a constructive validity study. Novices benefited most from VR training and performance in the operating room improved significantly after VR training. Good spatial perception and positive stress coping strategies also enhanced laparoscopic performance. VR simulation provides a tool to shift the laparoscopic learning curve outside the operating room and thus contributes to patient safety. It would be worthwhile to include VR training in the surgical curriculum. For economic reasons regional training centers seem to be an effective way to realize a broad implementation of VR simulation in surgical training. Application and development of VR simulators should be professionally promoted just as flight simulators in aviation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19838652     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-009-1757-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  23 in total

1.  The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J Voitk; S G Tsao; S Ignatius
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; T Heikkinen; L Iselius; C-E Leijonmarck; J Rutqvist; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Depth cue reliance in surgeons and medical students.

Authors:  J Shah; D Buckley; J Frisby; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough?

Authors:  William C Brunner; James R Korndorffer; Rafael Sierra; Nader N Massarweh; J Bruce Dunne; C Lillian Yau; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Katja Maschuw; Matthias Rothmund; Michael Koller; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.745

8.  Improvement of surgical skills after a three-day practical course for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Michael Koller; Andreas Zielke; Kai Lehmann; Matthias Rothmund; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Spatial perception predicts laparoscopic skills on virtual reality laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  I Hassan; B Gerdes; M Koller; B Dick; D Hellwig; M Rothmund; A Zielke
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 1.532

10.  Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Lena Carstensen; Svend Schulze
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation.

Authors:  James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [From historical all-rounder to modern specialists: surgical further education in Germany from 1994 to 2012].

Authors:  C Lindlohr; M Rose; H Scheuerlein; U Settmacher; M M Heiss; C Pape-Koehler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  How to conduct a successful workshop: The trainees' perspective.

Authors:  Michail Christodoulou; Stefanos Kachrilas; Ahmed Dina; Andreas Bourdoumis; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz; Athanasios Papatsoris
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-09-12

4.  Measurement of the Physical Properties during Laparoscopic Surgery Performed on Pigs by Using Forceps with Pressure Sensors.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamanaka; Kazuhide Makiyama; Kimito Osaka; Manabu Nagasaka; Masato Ogata; Takahiro Yamada; Yoshinobu Kubota
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-02-17

5.  Preparation for pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction using a patient-specific laparoscopic simulator: a case report.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamanaka; Kazuhide Makiyama; Tomoyuki Tatenuma; Ryoko Sakata; Futoshi Sano; Yoshinobu Kubota
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-10-05

6.  Multimedia-based training on Internet platforms improves surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carolina Pape-Koehler; Marc Immenroth; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Cornelia Lindlohr; Jens Toaspern; Markus Heiss
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.