Literature DB >> 18322767

[Simulation of laparoscopic surgery--four years' experience at the Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Marburg].

Iyad Hassan1, Thomas Osei-Agymang, Daniela Radu, Berthold Gerdes, Matthias Rothmund, Emilio Domínguez Fernández.   

Abstract

It is well known that learning curves are longer for laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery. Recently, virtual reality (VR) simulation was developed as alternative to conventional training. Such a new training system makes it possible to offer a wide range of repeatable surgical situations, and thus, enable assessments based on direct observation of performance. During the last four years we did several studies using a VR simulator (LapSim). After a constructive validity study - discrimination between novices and experienced laparoscopic surgeons, we were able to show that advanced residents benefit most from a three-day practical course for laparoscopic surgery, while - in a further investigation - we found contrary to training at the Pelvitrainer that novices in laparoscopic surgery have the most benefit from VR training. Minimally invasive surgery is significantly more sophisticated for the surgeon than open surgery. While Research on laparoscopic surgery has focused primarily on the development and assessment of technical skills, non technical skills such as visual-spatial perception and stress coping has received much less attention. We showed that spatial perception as well as stress coping positively correlates with virtual laparoscopic skills. A high degree of spatial perception led to faster adaption to a non-stereo environment and correlated with high level of laparoscopic skills. Furthermore, Ineffective stress-coping strategies correlate with poor virtual laparoscopic performance. VR simulation seems to be a promising tool to improve laparoscopic skills in a modern apprenticeship model. According to patient safety, the development of this instrument for surgery should be advanced professionally just as a flight simulators in aviation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18322767     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-008-0930-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  38 in total

1.  Validity of surgical simulation for the assessment of operative skill.

Authors:  A M Paisley; P J Baldwin; S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; T Heikkinen; L Iselius; C-E Leijonmarck; J Rutqvist; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; L J Monteny; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Determination of face validity for the Simbionix LAP mentor virtual reality training module.

Authors:  I D Ayodeji; M P Schijven; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

6.  Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Katja Maschuw; Matthias Rothmund; Michael Koller; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.745

7.  Improvement of surgical skills after a three-day practical course for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Michael Koller; Andreas Zielke; Kai Lehmann; Matthias Rothmund; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  Negative stress-coping strategies among novices in surgery correlate with poor virtual laparoscopic performance.

Authors:  I Hassan; P Weyers; K Maschuw; B Dick; B Gerdes; M Rothmund; A Zielke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Spatial perception predicts laparoscopic skills on virtual reality laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  I Hassan; B Gerdes; M Koller; B Dick; D Hellwig; M Rothmund; A Zielke
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 1.532

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation.

Authors:  James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training.

Authors:  Florian M Franzeck; Rachel Rosenthal; Markus K Muller; Antonio Nocito; Frauke Wittich; Christine Maurus; Daniel Dindo; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Virtual reality does not meet expectations in a pilot study on multimodal laparoscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Vasile V Bintintan; Tobias Gehrig; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Spatial abilities training in the field of technical skills in health care: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; Christian Bellemare; Josée Toulouse; George A Wells
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.