Literature DB >> 12792012

Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.

G Harvey1, M Wensing.   

Abstract

Evaluation is an integral component of quality improvement and there is much to be learned from the evaluation of small scale quality improvement initiatives at a local level. This type of evaluation is useful for a number of different reasons including monitoring the impact of local projects, identifying and dealing with issues as they arise within a project, comparing local projects to draw lessons, and collecting more detailed information as part of a bigger evaluation project. Focused audits and developmental studies can be used for evaluation within projects, while methods such as multiple case studies and process evaluations can be used to draw generalised lessons from local experiences and to provide examples of successful projects. Evaluations of small scale quality improvement projects help those involved in improvement initiatives to optimise their choice of interventions and use of resources. Important information to add to the knowledge base of quality improvement in health care can be derived by undertaking formal evaluation of local projects, particularly in relation to building theory around the processes of implementation and increasing understanding of the complex change processes involved.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12792012      PMCID: PMC1743722          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  15 in total

1.  Evidence-based practice: tap water cleansing of leg ulcers in the community.

Authors:  P Selim; C Bashford; C Grossman
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 2.  Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness.

Authors:  L Locock; S Dopson; D Chambers; J Gabbay
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies.

Authors:  M Eccles; J Grimshaw; M Campbell; C Ramsay
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

4.  Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions.

Authors:  M E J L Hulscher; M G H Laurant; R P T M Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

5.  No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based.

Authors:  Sue Dopson; Louise FitzGerald; Ewan Ferlie; John Gabbay; Louise Locock
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2002

6.  Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-11

7.  Evidence into practice, experimentation and quasi experimentation: are the methods up to the task?

Authors:  N Freemantle; J Wood; F Crawford
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The three faces of performance measurement: improvement, accountability, and research.

Authors:  L I Solberg; G Mosser; S McDonald
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1997-03

9.  Improving the repeat prescribing process in a busy general practice. A study using continuous quality improvement methodology.

Authors:  S Cox; P Wilcock; J Young
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-06

10.  Changing clinical practice: views about the management of adult asthma.

Authors:  S Dawson; K Sutherland; S Dopson; R Miller
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12
View more
  14 in total

1.  Evaluating large-scale health programmes at a district level in resource-limited countries.

Authors:  Theodore Svoronos; Kedar S Mate
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Putting evidence into practice: how middle and low income countries "get it together".

Authors:  Paul Garner; Martin Meremikwu; Jimmy Volmink; Qian Xu; Helen Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-30

3.  Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project.

Authors:  F Davidoff; P Batalden
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

4.  Reducing inequalities in access to health care: developing a toolkit through action research.

Authors:  E C Goyder; L Blank; E Ellis; A Furber; J Peters; K Sartain; C Massey
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

5.  Janus computerised prescribing system provides pharmacological knowledge at point of care - design, development and proof of concept.

Authors:  Marie Eliasson; Pia Bastholm; Peter Forsberg; Kjell Henriksson; Lennart Jacobson; Anders Nilsson; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy.

Authors:  Gill Harvey; Louise Fitzgerald; Sandra Fielden; Anne McBride; Heather Waterman; David Bamford; Roman Kislov; Ruth Boaden
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  The estimation of patients' views on organizational aspects of a general dental practice by general dental practitioners: a survey study.

Authors:  Rutger E Sonneveld; Michel Wensing; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Gert-Jan Truin; Wolter G Brands
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Quality improvement of neuro-oncology services: integrating the routine collection of patient-reported, health-related quality-of-life measures.

Authors:  Rocío Fernández-Méndez; Rebecca J Rastall; William A Sage; Ingela Oberg; Gemma Bullen; Amy Louise Charge; Anna Crofton; Thomas Santarius; Colin Watts; Stephen J Price; Andrew Brodbelt; Alexis J Joannides
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-10-17

9.  Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient Distress Thermometer.

Authors:  Johanna Lynch; Frances Goodhart; Yolande Saunders; Stephen J O'Connor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI Series.

Authors:  Candice C Bowman; Elisa J Sobo; Steven M Asch; Allen L Gifford
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.