Literature DB >> 12571344

Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions.

M E J L Hulscher1, M G H Laurant, R P T M Grol.   

Abstract

To design potentially successful quality improvement (QI) interventions, it is crucial to make use of detailed breakdowns of the implementation processes of successful and unsuccessful interventions. Process evaluation can throw light on the mechanisms responsible for the result obtained in the intervention group. It enables researchers and implementers to (1). describe the intervention in detail, (2). check actual exposure to the intervention, and (3). describe the experience of those exposed. This paper presents a framework containing features of QI interventions that might influence success. Attention is paid to features of the target group, the implementers or change agents, the frequency of intervention activities, and features of the information imparted. The framework can be used as a starting point to address all three aspects of process evaluation mentioned above. Process evaluation can be applied to small scale improvement projects, controlled QI studies, and large scale QI programmes; in each case it plays a different role.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12571344      PMCID: PMC1743654          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  8 in total

1.  Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns improving preventive care.

Authors:  N B Baskerville; W Hogg; J Lemelin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.

Authors:  R P Hermens; E Hak; M E Hulscher; J C Braspenning; R P Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality.

Authors:  C Pope; P van Royen; R Baker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

4.  Tailored outreach visits as a method for implementing guidelines and improving preventive care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; B B van Drenth; H G Mokkink; E H van De Lisdonk; J C van Der Wouden; C van Weel; R P Grol
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group.

Authors:  L A Bero; R Grilli; J M Grimshaw; E Harvey; A D Oxman; M A Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

Review 6.  Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-16

7.  Effectiveness and cost of different strategies for information feedback in general practice.

Authors:  A Szczepura; J Wilmot; C Davies; J Fletcher
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Improving the utilization of screening mammography in primary care practices.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; R J Panzer; J Janus
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-09
  8 in total
  113 in total

1.  Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.

Authors:  G Harvey; M Wensing
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-06

2.  Implementation of the Community Health Assistant (CHA) Cadre in Zambia: A Process Evaluation to Guide Future Scale-Up Decisions.

Authors:  Katharine D Shelley; Yekoyesew W Belete; Sydney Chauwa Phiri; Mutinta Musonda; Elizabeth Chizema Kawesha; Evelyn Mutinta Muleya; Caroline Phiri Chibawe; Jan Willem van den Broek; Kathryn Bradford Vosburg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-04

3.  The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience.

Authors:  Cheryl B Stetler; Marcia W Legro; Carolyn M Wallace; Candice Bowman; Marylou Guihan; Hildi Hagedorn; Barbara Kimmel; Nancy D Sharp; Jeffrey L Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Understanding health care organization needs and context. Beyond performance gaps.

Authors:  Laura K Kochevar; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care.

Authors:  G R Baker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

Review 6.  Quality improvement of paediatric care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Tom W J Schulpen; Kiki M J Lombarts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Effects of quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-06-24

8.  A trial of education, prompts, and opinion leaders to improve prescription of lipid modifying therapy by primary care physicians for patients with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  H E Bloomfield; D B Nelson; M van Ryn; B J Neil; N J Koets; J N Basile; F F Samaha; R Kaul; J L Mehta; D Bouland
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

9.  Variability in Implementation of Interventions Aimed at Reducing Readmissions Among Patients With Heart Failure: A Survey of Teaching Hospitals.

Authors:  Eduard E Vasilevskis; Sunil Kripalani; Michael K Ong; J Thomas Rosenthal; David E Longnecker; Brian Harmon; Samuel F Hohmann; Kelly Wright; Jeanne T Black
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Systematic care for caregivers of people with dementia in the ambulatory mental health service: designing a multicentre, cluster, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Anouk Spijker; Frans Verhey; Maud Graff; Richard Grol; Eddy Adang; Hub Wollersheim; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.