Literature DB >> 10557675

Improving the repeat prescribing process in a busy general practice. A study using continuous quality improvement methodology.

S Cox1, P Wilcock, J Young.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: A need to improve service to patients by reducing the time wasted by reception staff so that the 48 hour target for processing repeat prescription requests for patient collection could be achieved.
DESIGN: An interprofessional team was established within the practice to tackle the area of repeat prescribing which had been identified as a priority by practice reception staff. The team met four times in three months and used continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodology (including the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle) with the assistance of an external facilitator. BACKGROUND AND
SETTING: A seven partner practice serving the 14,000 patients on the northern outskirts of Bournemouth including a large council estate and a substantial student population from Bournemouth University. The repeat prescribing process is computerised. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Reducing turn around times for repeat prescription requests. Reducing numbers of requests which need medical records to be checked to issue the script. Feedback to staff about the working of the process. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Using a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for guidance, the team decided to (a) coincide repeat medications and to record on the computer drugs prescribed during visits; (b) give signing of prescriptions a higher priority and bring them to doctors' desks at an agreed time; and (c) move the site for printing prescriptions to the reception desk so as to facilitate face to face queries. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Prescription turnaround within 48 hours increased from 95% to 99% with reduced variability case to case and at a reduced cost. The number of prescriptions needing records to be looked at was reduced from 18% to 8.6%. This saved at least one working day of receptionist time each month. Feedback from all staff within the practice indicated greatly increased satisfaction with the newly designed process. LESSONS LEARNT: The team's experience suggests that a combination of audit and improvement methodology offers a powerful way to learn about, and improve, practice. The interventions used by the team not only produced measurable and sustainable improvements but also helped the team to learn about the cost of achieving the results and provided them with tools to accomplish the aims. The importance of feedback to all staff about CQI measures was also recognised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10557675      PMCID: PMC2483640          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.8.2.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  7 in total

1.  Adapting total quality management for general practice: evaluation of a programme.

Authors:  M Lawrence; T Packwood
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-09

2.  Quality management in the NHS: the doctor's role--I.

Authors:  D M Berwick; A Enthoven; J P Bunker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25

3.  Improving health care, Part 4: Concepts for improving any clinical process.

Authors:  P B Batalden; J J Mohr; E C Nelson; S K Plume
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1996-10

Review 4.  Integrated care pathways: effective tools for continuous evaluation of clinical practice.

Authors:  D Kitchiner; C Davidson; P Bundred
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Quality improvement in general practice.

Authors:  J Wilmot; C Davies
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Continuous quality improvement and knowledge for improvement applied to asthma care.

Authors:  L Headrick; W Katcher; D Neuhauser; E McEachern
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1994-10
  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Quality improvement reports: a new kind of article. They should allow authors to describe improvement projects so others can learn.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-09

2.  The Dorset Seedcorn Project: interprofessional learning and continuous quality improvement in primary care.

Authors:  Peter M Wilcock; Charles Campion-Smith; Michael Head
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.

Authors:  G Harvey; M Wensing
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-06

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.

Authors:  N Bruce Baskerville; Clare Liddy; William Hogg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Using real time process measurements to reduce catheter related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  R J Wall; E W Ely; T A Elasy; R S Dittus; J Foss; K S Wilkerson; T Speroff
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

Review 6.  Facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental health care: Systematic review.

Authors:  Donald Addington; Tania Kyle; Soni Desai; JianLi Wang
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study.

Authors:  Deborah Swinglehurst; Trisha Greenhalgh; Jill Russell; Michelle Myall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-03

8.  Early detection of maternal deaths in Senegal through household-based death notification integrating verbal and social autopsy: a community-level case study.

Authors:  Mosa Moshabela; Massamba Sene; Ingrid Nanne; Yombo Tankoano; Jennifer Schaefer; Oumulkhairy Niang; Sonia Ehrlich Sachs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Repeat prescribing of medications: A system-centred risk management model for primary care organisations.

Authors:  Julie Price; Shu Ling Man; Stephen Bartlett; Kate Taylor; Mark Dinwoodie; Paul Bowie
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  James E Hill; Anne-Marie Stephani; Paul Sapple; Andrew J Clegg
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.