OBJECTIVE: To develop and verify proof of concept for a user-defined prescribing system with decision support based on one single database consisting of several pharmacological sources. METHODS: A multidisciplinary working group within the framework of a two-phase project developed the tool. A small-scale pilot study for proof of concept was carried out in an outpatient neurological polyclinic where four experienced physicians used the tool in patient care on a daily basis. RESULTS: Automatically generated functions, such as recommended drugs, alerts for interactions, alerts for drug therapy during pregnancy and breast-feeding and a search tool for adverse drug effects, were quickly adopted into the daily outpatient working regime. Functions such as treatment strategies and a link to a producer independent website were less frequently used but still rated as useful and educational. CONCLUSION: Searches for information that can be concentrated in one system saves time. Alerts inevitably draw physicians' attention to the information. Instant availability to drug recommendations in a computerised prescribing system such as Janus should increase adherence to recommendations, but this needs to be evaluated systematically. Small-scale pilot studies such as the one reported here have been shown to be invaluable in providing the theoretical basis for implementation of the system and for gaining an understanding of the complex change processes involved. Small-scale projects can therefore provided a base for further development and broader implementation of pharmacological tools and services.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and verify proof of concept for a user-defined prescribing system with decision support based on one single database consisting of several pharmacological sources. METHODS: A multidisciplinary working group within the framework of a two-phase project developed the tool. A small-scale pilot study for proof of concept was carried out in an outpatient neurological polyclinic where four experienced physicians used the tool in patient care on a daily basis. RESULTS: Automatically generated functions, such as recommended drugs, alerts for interactions, alerts for drug therapy during pregnancy and breast-feeding and a search tool for adverse drug effects, were quickly adopted into the daily outpatient working regime. Functions such as treatment strategies and a link to a producer independent website were less frequently used but still rated as useful and educational. CONCLUSION: Searches for information that can be concentrated in one system saves time. Alerts inevitably draw physicians' attention to the information. Instant availability to drug recommendations in a computerised prescribing system such as Janus should increase adherence to recommendations, but this needs to be evaluated systematically. Small-scale pilot studies such as the one reported here have been shown to be invaluable in providing the theoretical basis for implementation of the system and for gaining an understanding of the complex change processes involved. Small-scale projects can therefore provided a base for further development and broader implementation of pharmacological tools and services.
Authors: Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Leslie R Harrold; Jeffrey Rothschild; Kristin Debellis; Andrew C Seger; Cynthia Cadoret; Leslie S Fish; Lawrence Garber; Michael Kelleher; David W Bates Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lars L Gustafsson; Kenneth Widäng; Mikael Hoffmann; Eva Andersén-Karlsson; Karin Elfman; Björn Johansson; Eva Johansson; Mats Larson Journal: Lakartidningen Date: 2003-04-10
Authors: Douglas S Bell; Richard S Marken; Robin C Meili; C Jason Wang; Mayde Rosen; Robert H Brook Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2004 Jan-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Ylva Böttiger; Kari Laine; Marine L Andersson; Tuomas Korhonen; Björn Molin; Marie-Louise Ovesjö; Tuire Tirkkonen; Anders Rane; Lars L Gustafsson; Birgit Eiermann Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Annette Moxey; Jane Robertson; David Newby; Isla Hains; Margaret Williamson; Sallie-Anne Pearson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Björn Wettermark; Brian Godman; Karolina Andersson; Lars L Gustafsson; Alan Haycox; Vittorio Bertele Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Gunnar Alván; Marine L Andersson; Annika B Asplund; Ylva Böttiger; Carl-Eric Elwin; Lars L Gustafsson; Birgitta Öhman; Elisabeth Törnqvist Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Anders Helldén; Fadiea Al-Aieshy; Pia Bastholm-Rahmner; Ulf Bergman; Lars L Gustafsson; Hans Höök; Susanne Sjöviker; Anders Söderström; Ingegerd Odar-Cederlöf Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 2.692