Literature DB >> 12783916

Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.

Kaveh G Shojania1, Elizabeth C Burton, Kathryn M McDonald, Lee Goldman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Substantial discrepanies exist between clinical diagnoses and findings at autopsy. Autopsy may be used as a tool for quality management to analyze diagnostic discrepanies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate at which autopsies detect important, clinically missed diagnoses, and the extent to which this rate has changed over time. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search for English-language articles available on MEDLINE from 1966 to April 2002, using the search terms autopsy, postmortem changes, post-mortem, postmortem, necropsy, and posthumous, identified 45 studies reporting 53 distinct autopsy series meeting prospectively defined criteria. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional studies, and the final bibliography was distributed to experts in the field to identify missing or unpublished studies. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies reported clinically missed diagnoses involving a primary cause of death (major errors), with the most serious being those likely to have affected patient outcome (class I errors). DATA EXTRACTION: Logistic regression was performed using data from 53 distinct autopsy series over a 40-year period and adjusting for the effects of changes in autopsy rates, country, case mix (general autopsies; adult medical; adult intensive care; adult or pediatric surgery; general pediatrics or pediatric inpatients; neonatal or pediatric intensive care; and other autopsy), and important methodological features of the primary studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 53 autopsy series identified, 42 reported major errors and 37 reported class I errors. Twenty-six autopsy series reported both major and class I error rates. The median error rate was 23.5% (range, 4.1%-49.8%) for major errors and 9.0% (range, 0%-20.7%) for class I errors. Analyses of diagnostic error rates adjusting for the effects of case mix, country, and autopsy rate yielded relative decreases per decade of 19.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-33.8%) for major errors and 33.4% (95% [CI], 8.4%-51.6%) for class I errors. Despite these decreases, we estimated that a contemporary US institution (based on autopsy rates ranging from 100% [the extrapolated extreme at which clinical selection is eliminated] to 5% [roughly the national average]), could observe a major error rate from 8.4% to 24.4% and a class I error rate from 4.1% to 6.7%.
CONCLUSION: The possibility that a given autopsy will reveal important unsuspected diagnoses has decreased over time, but remains sufficiently high that encouraging ongoing use of the autopsy appears warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783916     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  153 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic error and neuro-ophthalmology.

Authors:  Leanne Stunkel; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  [Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Death of the teaching autopsy: advances in technology have not reduced the value of the autopsy.

Authors:  Gema Frühbeck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

4.  A follow-up report card on computer-assisted diagnosis--the grade: C+.

Authors:  Craig A Umscheid; C William Hanson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The medical autopsy: past, present, and dubious future.

Authors:  Louis P Dehner
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

6.  Researching and preventing diagnostic errors: chasing patient safety from a different angle.

Authors:  A Schattner
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2015-10-01

7.  Can Think Aloud Be Used to Teach and Assess Clinical Reasoning in Graduate Medical Education?

Authors:  Ralph Pinnock; Louise Young; Fiona Spence; Marcus Henning; Wayne Hazell
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-09

Review 8.  The impact of cerebral metastases growth pattern on neurosurgical treatment.

Authors:  Marcel A Kamp; Philipp J Slotty; Jan F Cornelius; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Marion Rapp; Michael Sabel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Quantification of PpIX-fluorescence of cerebral metastases: a pilot study.

Authors:  Johannes Knipps; Igor Fischer; Lisa M Neumann; Marion Rapp; Maxine Dibué-Adjei; Christiane Freiin von Saß; Jan-Malte Placke; Hendrik-Jan Mijderwijk; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Michael Sabel; Jan-Frederick Cornelius; Marcel A Kamp
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.