Literature DB >> 20446515

The medical autopsy: past, present, and dubious future.

Louis P Dehner1.   

Abstract

The medical autopsy is the most reliable and thorough means after the death of a patient that a physician has to evaluate the validity of his/her clinical diagnosis on which care was delivered. There is virtually no dispute in the literature of its value in the assessment of the quality of care. Today the medical autopsy has been largely abandoned except in academic medical centers. Even in the latter setting, the number of autopsies has steadily declined over the past 30-40 years. Approximately 360 autopsies are performed per year at the Washington University Medical Center in St. Louis; this number represents only 20% of all deaths in this medical center. The autopsy is time intensive and expensive in the environment of ever increasing pressure to reduce medical costs on all fronts. Will the autopsy survive? There are many reasons to advocate for the autopsy and they are considered in this discussion. The reasons to perform an autopsy remain as pertinent and relevant today as they did 50 to 100 years ago.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20446515      PMCID: PMC6188261     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mo Med        ISSN: 0026-6620


  23 in total

Review 1.  Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Elizabeth C Burton; Kathryn M McDonald; Lee Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Attitudes toward the autopsy--an 8-state survey.

Authors:  Peter N Nemetz; Eric Tanglos; Laura P Sands; William P Fisher; William P Newman; Elizabeth C Burton
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-09-21

Review 3.  The autopsy and health statistics.

Authors:  R B Hill; R E Anderson
Journal:  Leg Med       Date:  1990

4.  Autopsy. A comprehensive review of current issues. Council on Scientific Affairs.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A history of the autopsy. A review.

Authors:  L S King; M C Meehan
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Failure to perform autopsies means some MDs "walking in a fog of misplaced optimism".

Authors:  F Lowry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras.

Authors:  B Veress; I Alafuzoff
Journal:  Qual Assur Health Care       Date:  1993-12

8.  The autopsy as a performance measurement tool--diagnostic discrepancies and unresolved clinical questions: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 2479 autopsies from 248 institutions.

Authors:  R J Zarbo; P B Baker; P J Howanitz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Percutaneous needle autopsy sampling.

Authors:  B M Huston; N N Malouf; H A Azar
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Influence of death certificate errors on cancer mortality trends.

Authors:  D G Hoel; E Ron; R Carter; K Mabuchi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Global Trends of Latent Prostate Cancer in Autopsy Studies.

Authors:  Takahiro Kimura; Shun Sato; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Shin Egawa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 2.  Reviving the Autopsy for Modern Cancer Evolution Research.

Authors:  Tamsin Joy Robb; Rexson Tse; Cherie Blenkiron
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.