Literature DB >> 12779123

Tritrophic choice experiments with bt plants, the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) and the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae.

Tanja H Schuler1, Roel P J Potting, Ian Denholm, Suzanne J Clark, Alison J Clark, C Neal Stewart, Guy M Poppy.   

Abstract

Parasitoids are important natural enemies of many pest species and are used extensively in biological and integrated control programmes. Crop plants transformed to express toxin genes derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) provide high levels of resistance to certain pest species, which is likely to have consequent effects on parasitoids specialising on such pests. A better understanding of the interaction between transgenic plants, pests and parasitoids is important to limit disruption of biological control and to provide background knowledge essential for implementing measures for the conservation of parasitoid populations. It is also essential for investigations into the potential role of parasitoids in delaying the build-up of Bt-resistant pest populations. The diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella), a major pest of brassica crops, is normally highly susceptible to a range of Bt toxins. However, extensive use of microbial Bt sprays has led to the selection of resistance to Bt toxins in P. xylostella. Cotesia plutellae is an important endoparasitoid of P. xylostella larvae. Although unable to survive in Bt-susceptible P. xylostella larvae on highly resistant Bt oilseed rape plants due to premature host mortality, C. plutellae is able to complete its larval development in Bt-resistant P. xylostella larvae. Experiments of parasitoid flight and foraging behaviour presented in this paper showed that adult C. plutellae females do not distinguish between Bt and wildtype oilseed rape plants, and are more attracted to Bt plants damaged by Bt-resistant hosts than by susceptible hosts. This stronger attraction to Bt plants damaged by resistant hosts was due to more extensive feeding damage. Population scale experiments with mixtures of Bt and wildtype plants demonstrated that the parasitoid is as effective in controlling Bt-resistant P. xylostella larvae on Bt plants as on wildtype plants. In these experiments equal or higher numbers of parasitoid adults emerged per transgenic as per wildtype plant. The implications for integrated pest management and the evolution of resistance to Bt in P. xylostella are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12779123     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023342027192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  16 in total

1.  GM crops: environmental risks and non-target effects.

Authors:  G Poppy
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Reversing insect adaptation to transgenic insecticidal plants.

Authors:  Y Carrière; B E Tabashnik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Population-scale laboratory studies of the effect of transgenic plants on nontarget insects.

Authors:  T H Schuler; I Denholm; L Jouanin; S J Clark; A J Clark; G M Poppy
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Global variation in the genetic and biochemical basis of diamondback moth resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  B E Tabashnik; Y B Liu; T Malvar; D G Heckel; L Masson; V Ballester; F Granero; J L Ménsua; J Ferré
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Immunological analysis of phloem sap of Bacillus thuringiensis corn and of the nontarget herbivore Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) for the presence of Cry1Ab.

Authors:  A Raps; J Kehr; P Gugerli; W J Moar; F Bigler; A Hilbeck
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Interactions between the Fungal Entomopathogen Zoophthora radicans Brefeld (Entomophthorales) and Two Hymenopteran Parasitoids Attacking the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella L.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps.

Authors:  T C Turlings; J H Tumlinson; W J Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Transgenic crop plants expressing synthetic cry9Aa gene are protected against insect damage.

Authors:  K Koivu; A Kanerva; E Pehu
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 4.729

9.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) and cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata).

Authors:  T D Metz; R Dixit; E D Earle
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  Transgenic plants of rutabaga (Brassica napobrassica) tolerant to pest insects.

Authors:  X B Li; H Z Mao; Y Y Bai
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.570

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effect of Bt broccoli and resistant genotype of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on development and host acceptance of the parasitoid Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).

Authors:  Xiaoxia Liu; Mao Chen; David Onstad; Rick Roush; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Evaluating the induced-odour emission of a Bt maize and its attractiveness to parasitic wasps.

Authors:  Ted C J Turlings; Philippe M Jeanbourquin; Matthias Held; Thomas Degen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies.

Authors:  Anthony M Shelton; Steven E Naranjo; Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Jeffrey D Wolt; Brian A Federici; Ramon Albajes; Franz Bigler; Elisabeth P J Burgess; Galen P Dively; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Louise A Malone; Richard Roush; Mark Sears; Frantisek Sehnal
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris to host (Spodoptera frugiperda) frass is affected by transgenic maize.

Authors:  Nicolas Desneux; Ricardo Ramírez-Romero; Aimé H Bokonon-Ganta; Julio S Bernal
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 5.  Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?

Authors:  Vassili V Velkov; Alexander B Medvinsky; Mikhail S Sokolov; Anatoly I Marchenko
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Impact of botanical pesticides derived from Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica plants on the emission of volatiles that attract Parasitoids of the diamondback moth to cabbage plants.

Authors:  Deidre S Charleston; Rieta Gols; Kees A Hordijk; Rami Kfir; Louise E M Vet; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Comparison between volatile emissions from transgenic apples and from two representative classically bred apple cultivars.

Authors:  Ute Vogler; Anja S Rott; Cesare Gessler; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Prey-mediated effects of transgenic canola on a beneficial, non-target, carabid beetle.

Authors:  Natalie Ferry; Evan A Mulligan; C Neal Stewart; Bruce E Tabashnik; Gordon R Port; Angharad M R Gatehouse
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.145

9.  Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Marco P Candolfi; Keri Carstens; Adinda De Schrijver; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Rod A Herman; Joseph E Huesing; Morven A McLean; Alan Raybould; Anthony M Shelton; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Maize Resistant to Diabrotica spp.: Influence on Above-Ground Arthropods in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Zdeňka Svobodová; Oxana Skoková Habuštová; William D Hutchison; Hany M Hussein; František Sehnal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.