Literature DB >> 16315088

Evaluating the induced-odour emission of a Bt maize and its attractiveness to parasitic wasps.

Ted C J Turlings1, Philippe M Jeanbourquin, Matthias Held, Thomas Degen.   

Abstract

The current discussion on the safety of transgenic crops includes their effects on beneficial insects, such as parasitoids and predators of pest insects. One important plant trait to consider in this context is the emission of volatiles in response to herbivory. Natural enemies use the odours that result from these emissions as cues to locate their herbivorous prey and any significant change in these plant-provided signals may disrupt their search efficiency. There is a need for practical and reliable methods to evaluate transgenic crops for this and other important plant traits. Moreover, it is imperative that such evaluations are done in the context of variability for these traits among conventional genotypes of a crop. For maize and the induction of volatile emissions by caterpillar feeding this variability is known and realistic comparisons can therefore be made. Here we used a six-arm olfactometer that permits the simultaneous collection of volatiles emitted by multiple plants and testing of their attractiveness to insects. With this apparatus we measured the induced odour emissions of Bt maize (Bt11, N4640Bt) and its near-isogenic line (N4640) and the attractiveness of these odours to Cotesia marginiventris and Microplitis rufiventris, two important larval parasitoids of common lepidopteran pests. Both parasitoid species were strongly attracted to induced maize odour and neither wasp distinguished between the odours of the transgenic and the isogenic line. Also wasps that had previously experienced one of the odours during a successful oviposition divided their choices equally between the two odours. However, chemical analyses of collected odours revealed significant quantitative differences. The same 11 compounds dominated the blends of both genotypes, but the isogenic line released a larger amount of most of these. These differences may be due to altered resource allocation in the transgenic line, but it had no measurable effect on the wasps' behaviour. All compounds identified here had been previously reported for maize and the differential quantities in which they were released fall well within the range of variability observed for other maize genotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16315088     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-005-0008-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  18 in total

Review 1.  The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Anthony J Conner; Travis R Glare; Jan-Peter Nap
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Parasitism rates and sex ratios of a parasitoid wasp: effects of herbivore and plant quality.

Authors:  Laurel R Fox; Deborah K Letourneau; Jamin Eisenbach; Saskya Van Nouhuys
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of exposure to event 176 Bacillus thuringiensis corn pollen on monarch and black swallowtail caterpillars under field conditions.

Authors:  A R Zangerl; D McKenna; C L Wraight; M Carroll; P Ficarello; R Warner; M R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of fresh versus old leaf damage in the attraction of parasitic wasps to herbivore-induced maize volatiles.

Authors:  Maria Elena Hoballah; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps.

Authors:  T C Turlings; J H Loughrin; P J McCall; U S Röse; W J Lewis; J H Tumlinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions.

Authors:  C L Wraight; A R Zangerl; M J Carroll; M R Berenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Differential attractiveness of induced odors emitted by eight maize varieties for the parasitoid cotesia marginiventris: is quality or quantity important?

Authors:  Maria Elena Fritzsche Hoballah; Cristina Tamò; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF OVIPOSITION PREFERENCE AND LARVAL PERFORMANCE ON TWO HOSTS IN THE BRUCHID BEETLE, CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS.

Authors:  Charles W Fox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps.

Authors:  T C Turlings; J H Tumlinson; W J Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Tritrophic choice experiments with bt plants, the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) and the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae.

Authors:  Tanja H Schuler; Roel P J Potting; Ian Denholm; Suzanne J Clark; Alison J Clark; C Neal Stewart; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.788

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effect of Bt broccoli and resistant genotype of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on development and host acceptance of the parasitoid Diadegma insulare (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae).

Authors:  Xiaoxia Liu; Mao Chen; David Onstad; Rick Roush; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  Indirect defense responses to herbivory in grasses.

Authors:  Jörg Degenhardt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Effect of Bt genetic engineering on indirect defense in cotton via a tritrophic interaction.

Authors:  Maria Carolina Blassioli Moraes; Raul Alberto Laumann; Michely Ferreira Santos Aquino; Débora Pires Paula; Miguel Borges
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris to host (Spodoptera frugiperda) frass is affected by transgenic maize.

Authors:  Nicolas Desneux; Ricardo Ramírez-Romero; Aimé H Bokonon-Ganta; Julio S Bernal
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Volatile Organic Compounds Induced by Herbivory of the Soybean Looper Chrysodeixis includens in Transgenic Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean and the Behavioral Effect on the Parasitoid, Meteorus rubens.

Authors:  Priscila Strapasson; Delia M Pinto-Zevallos; Sandra M Da Silva Gomes; Paulo H G Zarbin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Duration of plant damage by host larvae affects attraction of two parasitoid species (Microplitis croceipes and Cotesia marginiventris) to cotton: implications for interspecific competition.

Authors:  Tolulope Morawo; Henry Fadamiro
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Herbivore-induced SABATH methyltransferases of maize that methylate anthranilic acid using s-adenosyl-L-methionine.

Authors:  Tobias G Köllner; Claudia Lenk; Nan Zhao; Irmgard Seidl-Adams; Jonathan Gershenzon; Feng Chen; Jörg Degenhardt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Does Singular and Stacked Corn Affect Choice Behavior for Oviposition and Feed in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)?

Authors:  P T Nascimento; R G Von Pinho; M A M Fadini; C S F Souza; F H Valicente
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.434

9.  Comparison between volatile emissions from transgenic apples and from two representative classically bred apple cultivars.

Authors:  Ute Vogler; Anja S Rott; Cesare Gessler; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Bt rice does not disrupt the host-searching behavior of the parasitoid Cotesia chilonis.

Authors:  Qingsong Liu; Jörg Romeis; Huilin Yu; Yongjun Zhang; Yunhe Li; Yufa Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.