Literature DB >> 19543801

Comparison between volatile emissions from transgenic apples and from two representative classically bred apple cultivars.

Ute Vogler1, Anja S Rott, Cesare Gessler, Silvia Dorn.   

Abstract

While most risk assessments contrast a transgenic resistant to its isogenic line, an additional comparison between the transgenic line and a classically bred cultivar with the same resistance gene would be highly desirable. Our approach was to compare headspace volatiles of transgenic scab resistant apple plants with two representative cultivars (the isogenic 'Gala' and the scab resistance gene-containing 'Florina'). As modifications in volatile profiles have been shown to alter plant relationships with non-target insects, we analysed headspace volatiles from apple plants subjected to different infection types by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Marked differences were found between healthy and leafminer (Phyllonorycter blancardella) infested genotypes, where emissions between the transgenic scab resistant line and the two cultivars differed quantitatively in four terpenes and an aromatic compound. However, these modified odour emissions were in the range of variability of the emissions recorded for the two standard cultivars that proved to be crucial references.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19543801     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-009-9294-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  33 in total

1.  Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Comparison of glass vessels and plastic bags for enclosing living plant parts for headspace analysis.

Authors:  Alex Stewart-Jones; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: "talking trees" in the genomics era.

Authors:  Ian T Baldwin; Rayko Halitschke; Anja Paschold; Caroline C von Dahl; Catherine A Preston
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Detlef Bartsch; Franz Bigler; Marco P Candolfi; Marco M C Gielkens; Susan E Hartley; Richard L Hellmich; Joseph E Huesing; Paul C Jepson; Raymond Layton; Hector Quemada; Alan Raybould; Robyn I Rose; Joachim Schiemann; Mark K Sears; Anthony M Shelton; Jeremy Sweet; Zigfridas Vaituzis; Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Changes in volatile emissions from apple trees and associated response of adult female codling moths over the fruit-growing season.

Authors:  Armelle Vallat; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  Effects of genetic modification on herbivore-induced volatiles from maize.

Authors:  Jennifer M Dean; Consuelo M De Moraes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Tritrophic choice experiments with bt plants, the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) and the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae.

Authors:  Tanja H Schuler; Roel P J Potting; Ian Denholm; Suzanne J Clark; Alison J Clark; C Neal Stewart; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates.

Authors:  Michelle Marvier; Chanel McCreedy; James Regetz; Peter Kareiva
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Diurnal variation of walnut tree volatiles and electrophysiological responses in Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).

Authors:  Daniel Casado; César Gemeno; Jesús Avilla; Magí Riba
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.845

10.  13C-labelling patterns of green leaf volatiles indicating different dynamics of precursors in Brassica leaves.

Authors:  Edward C Connor; Anja S Rott; Michael Zeder; Friedrich Jüttner; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.072

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of Bt genetic engineering on indirect defense in cotton via a tritrophic interaction.

Authors:  Maria Carolina Blassioli Moraes; Raul Alberto Laumann; Michely Ferreira Santos Aquino; Débora Pires Paula; Miguel Borges
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Volatile Organic Compounds Induced by Herbivory of the Soybean Looper Chrysodeixis includens in Transgenic Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean and the Behavioral Effect on the Parasitoid, Meteorus rubens.

Authors:  Priscila Strapasson; Delia M Pinto-Zevallos; Sandra M Da Silva Gomes; Paulo H G Zarbin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability.

Authors:  Michele Gusberti; Urs Klemm; Matthias S Meier; Monika Maurhofer; Isabel Hunger-Glaser
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Transgenic Bt rice does not challenge host preference of the target pest of rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  Xiao Sun; Wen Zhou; Hao Liu; Aijun Zhang; Chao-Ren Ai; Shuang-Shuang Zhou; Chang-Xiang Zhou; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.