Literature DB >> 16906450

Prey-mediated effects of transgenic canola on a beneficial, non-target, carabid beetle.

Natalie Ferry1, Evan A Mulligan, C Neal Stewart, Bruce E Tabashnik, Gordon R Port, Angharad M R Gatehouse.   

Abstract

Transgenic plants producing insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) can control some major insect pests and reduce reliance on sprayed insecticides. However, large scale adoption of this technology has raised concerns about potential negative effects, including evolution of pest resistance to Bt toxins, transgene flow from Bt crops to other plants, and harm to non-target beneficial organisms. Furthermore, concern has also been expressed over the effects this technology may have on biodiversity in general. Ecologically relevant risk assessment is therefore required (Risk = Hazard x Exposure). Transgenic plants that produce Bt toxins to kill insect pests could harm beneficial predators. This might occur directly by transmission of toxin via prey, or indirectly by toxin-induced reduction in prey quality (Hazard). To test these hypotheses, we determined the effects of Bt-producing canola on a predatory ground beetle (Pterostichus madidus) fed larvae of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) that were either susceptible or resistant to the Bt toxin. Survival, weight gain, and adult reproductive fitness did not differ between beetles fed prey reared on Bt-producing plants and those fed prey from control plants. Furthermore, while Bt-resistant prey was shown to deliver high levels of toxin to the beetle when they were consumed, no significant impact upon the beetle was observed. Subsequent investigation showed that in choice tests (Exposure), starved and partially satiated female beetles avoided Bt-fed susceptible prey, but not Bt-fed resistant prey. However, in the rare cases when starved females initially selected Bt-fed susceptible prey, they rapidly rejected them after beginning to feed. This prey type was shown to provide sufficient nutrition to support reproduction in the bioassay suggesting that Bt-fed susceptible prey is acceptable in the absence of alternative prey, however adults possess a discrimination ability based on prey quality. These results suggest that the direct effects of Bt-producing canola on predator life history was minimal, and that predators' behavioural preferences may mitigate negative indirect effects of reduced quality of prey caused by consumption of Bt-producing plants. The results presented here therefore suggest that cultivation of Bt canola may lead to conservation of non-target predatory and scavenging organisms beneficial in pest control, such as carabids, and may therefore provide more sustainable agricultural systems than current practices. In addition, minimal impacts on beneficial carabids in agro-ecosystems suggest that Bt canola crops are likely to be compatible with integrated pest management (IPM) systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16906450     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-006-0021-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   3.145


  19 in total

1.  Resistance to Bt toxins.

Authors:  B E Tabashnik; R T Roush; E D Earle; A M Shelton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  L L Wolfenbarger; P R Phifer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).

Authors:  G L Lövei; K D Sunderland
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 4.  Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  Juan Ferré; Jeroen Van Rie
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 5.  Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.

Authors:  A M Shelton; J-Z Zhao; R T Roush
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Effects of Bt maize-fed prey on the generalist predator Poecilus cupreus L. (Coleoptera: Carabidae).

Authors:  Michael Meissle; Eva Vojtech; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Impact of oilseed rape expressing the insecticidal serine protease inhibitor, mustard trypsin inhibitor-2 on the beneficial predator Pterostichus madidus.

Authors:  N Ferry; L Jouanin; L R Ceci; E A Mulligan; K Emami; J A Gatehouse; A M R Gatehouse
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Impact of oilseed rape expressing the insecticidal cysteine protease inhibitor oryzacystatin on the beneficial predator Harmonia axyridis (multicoloured Asian ladybeetle).

Authors:  N Ferry; R J M Raemaekers; M E N Majerus; L Jouanin; G Port; J A Gatehouse; A M R Gatehouse
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Tritrophic choice experiments with bt plants, the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) and the parasitoid Cotesia plutellae.

Authors:  Tanja H Schuler; Roel P J Potting; Ian Denholm; Suzanne J Clark; Alison J Clark; C Neal Stewart; Guy M Poppy
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Anna Dutton; Franz Bigler
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2004 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 2.354

View more
  9 in total

1.  Occurrence and field densities of Coleoptera in the maize herb layer: implications for Environmental Risk Assessment of genetically modified Bt-maize.

Authors:  Stefan Rauschen; Frank Schaarschmidt; Achim Gathmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  The interaction of two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch, with Cry protein production and predation by Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) in Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab cotton and Cry1F maize.

Authors:  Yan-Yan Guo; Jun-Ce Tian; Wang-Peng Shi; Xue-Hui Dong; Jörg Romeis; Steven E Naranjo; Richard L Hellmich; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Bitrophic and tritrophic effects of Bt Cry3A transgenic potato on beneficial, non-target, beetles.

Authors:  Natalie Ferry; Evan A Mulligan; Michael E N Majerus; Angharad M R Gatehouse
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Bt crops producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab and Cry1F do not harm the green lacewing, Chrysoperla rufilabris.

Authors:  Jun-Ce Tian; Xiang-Ping Wang; Li-Ping Long; Jörg Romeis; Steven E Naranjo; Richard L Hellmich; Ping Wang; Elizabeth D Earle; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Marco P Candolfi; Keri Carstens; Adinda De Schrijver; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Rod A Herman; Joseph E Huesing; Morven A McLean; Alan Raybould; Anthony M Shelton; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  DNA barcoding simplifies environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in biodiverse regions.

Authors:  Chinyere V Nzeduru; Sandra Ronca; Mike J Wilkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Uptake and transfer of a Bt toxin by a Lepidoptera to its eggs and effects on its offspring.

Authors:  Débora Pires Paula; David A Andow; Renata Velozo Timbó; Edison R Sujii; Carmen S S Pires; Eliana M G Fontes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Integration of Plant Defense Traits with Biological Control of Arthropod Pests: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Julie A Peterson; Paul J Ode; Camila Oliveira-Hofman; James D Harwood
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Connected Carabids: Network Interactions and Their Impact on Biocontrol by Carabid Beetles.

Authors:  Stefanie E De Heij; Christian J Willenborg
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 8.589

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.