Literature DB >> 12769455

Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes.

Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter1, Arno Kuhn.   

Abstract

Honeybees communicate the distance and location of resource patches by bee dances, but this spatial information has rarely been used to study their foraging ecology. We analysed, for the first time to the best of the authors' knowledge, foraging distances and dance activities of honeybees in relation to landscape structure, season and colony using a replicated experimental approach on a landscape scale. We compared three structurally simple landscapes characterized by a high proportion of arable land and large patches, with three complex landscapes with a high proportion of semi-natural perennial habitats and low mean patch size. Four observation hives were placed in the centre of the landscapes and switched at regular intervals between the six landscapes from the beginning of May to the end of July. A total of 1137 bee dances were observed and decoded. Overall mean foraging distance was 1526.1 +/- 37.2 m, the median 1181.5 m and range 62.1-10037.1 m. Mean foraging distances of all bees and foraging distances of nectar-collecting bees did not significantly differ between simple and complex landscapes, but varied between month and colonies. Foraging distances of pollen-collecting bees were significantly larger in simple (1743 +/- 95.6 m) than in complex landscapes (1543.4 +/- 71 m) and highest in June when resources were scarce. Dancing activity, i.e. the number of observed bee dances per unit time, was significantly higher in complex than in simple landscapes, presumably because of larger spatial and temporal variability of resource patches in complex landscapes. The results facilitate an understanding of how human landscape modification may change the evolutionary significance of bee dances and ecological interactions, such as pollination and competition between honeybees and other bee species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12769455      PMCID: PMC1691282          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

Review 1.  The biology of the dance language.

Authors:  Fred C Dyer
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer".

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; S Zhang; M Altwein; J Tautz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale.

Authors:  I Steffan-Dewenter; U Münzenberg; T Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow.

Authors:  H E Esch; S Zhang; M V Srinivasan; J Tautz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields.

Authors:  Mary A Rieger; Michael Lamond; Christopher Preston; Stephen B Powles; Richard T Roush
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  62 in total

1.  Diverging landscape impacts on macronutrient status despite overlapping diets in managed (Apis mellifera) and native (Melissodes desponsa) bees.

Authors:  Christina L Mogren; María-Soledad Benítez; Kevin McCarter; Frédéric Boyer; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence.

Authors:  Catrin Westphal; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Scale-Dependent Waylaying Effect of Pollinators and Pollination of Mass-Flowering Plants.

Authors:  Z X Lu; Z H Xie; J W Zhao; Y Q Chen
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees.

Authors:  Maj Rundlöf; Georg K S Andersson; Riccardo Bommarco; Ingemar Fries; Veronica Hederström; Lina Herbertsson; Ove Jonsson; Björn K Klatt; Thorsten R Pedersen; Johanna Yourstone; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Influence of habitat complexity and landscape configuration on pollination and seed-dispersal interactions of wild cherry trees.

Authors:  Nils Breitbach; Svenja Tillmann; Matthias Schleuning; Claudia Grünewald; Irina Laube; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Bird diversity and seed dispersal along a human land-use gradient: high seed removal in structurally simple farmland.

Authors:  Nils Breitbach; Irina Laube; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Long-distance pollen flow assessment through evaluation of pollinator foraging range suggests transgene escape distances.

Authors:  Rémy S Pasquet; Alexis Peltier; Matthew B Hufford; Emeline Oudin; Jonathan Saulnier; Lénaic Paul; Jette T Knudsen; Hans R Herren; Paul Gepts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Natalie J Lemanski; Thiago Mosqueiro; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Antonio M Moreno; Jason M Tangen; Judith Reinhard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.