Literature DB >> 31062186

Scale-Dependent Waylaying Effect of Pollinators and Pollination of Mass-Flowering Plants.

Z X Lu1, Z H Xie2, J W Zhao1, Y Q Chen3.   

Abstract

Pollinators foraging for food resources can be waylaid by mass-flowering plants located in their foraging pathway in landscapes. The waylaying effect of pollinators is often studied at a single spatial scale; to date, little is known about the best spatial extent at which waylaying effect of pollinators can be measured. In this study, we selected a landscape with mass-flowering tufted vetches to determine the spatial scale of waylaying effect of honey bees as well as the consequence of waylaying effect on vetch pollination service. The spatial scale of waylaying effect was determined by the strongest association between honey bee density and distance, selected from a gradient of nested circular buffers centering on apiaries in three different locations. Linear models were used to predict the influence of flower visitor densities on pollination service. For our landscape, honey bee densities were best associated with distances at spatial scales of 500 m, 1150 m, and 1400 m respectively for the three locations of apiaries. Honey bee was the only pollinator whose density displayed a positive relationship with pollination service. At the scales of effect, honey bee density and pollination service declined along the distance. Our findings suggest that the waylaying effect of pollinators needs to be examined at a specific spatial scale and farmers who use honey bees to pollinate their mass-flowering crops need to consider the spatial scale of waylaying effect of pollinators in order to maximize pollination service within agricultural ecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis cerana Fabricius; Foraging distance; pollination service; pollinator decline; scale of effect; spatial distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31062186     DOI: 10.1007/s13744-019-00688-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neotrop Entomol        ISSN: 1519-566X            Impact factor:   1.434


  14 in total

Review 1.  Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses.

Authors:  Teja Tscharntke; Jason M Tylianakis; Tatyana A Rand; Raphael K Didham; Lenore Fahrig; Péter Batáry; Janne Bengtsson; Yann Clough; Thomas O Crist; Carsten F Dormann; Robert M Ewers; Jochen Fründ; Robert D Holt; Andrea Holzschuh; Alexandra M Klein; David Kleijn; Claire Kremen; Doug A Landis; William Laurance; David Lindenmayer; Christoph Scherber; Navjot Sodhi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Carsten Thies; Wim H van der Putten; Catrin Westphal
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2012-01-24

2.  Proximity to forest edge does not affect crop production despite pollen limitation.

Authors:  Natacha P Chacoff; Marcelo A Aizen; Valeria Aschero
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function.

Authors:  Berry J Brosi; Heather M Briggs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Circe principle explains how resource-rich land can waylay pollinators in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Tonya A Lander; Daniel P Bebber; Chris T L Choy; Stephen A Harris; David H Boshier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The Circe principle: are pollinators waylaid by attractive habitats?

Authors:  Ignasi Bartomeus; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service.

Authors:  Rachael Winfree; Jeremy W Fox; Neal M Williams; James R Reilly; Daniel P Cariveau
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Measuring and selecting scales of effect for landscape predictors in species-habitat models.

Authors:  Amanda E Martin; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Species abundance, not diet breadth, drives the persistence of the most linked pollinators as plant-pollinator networks disassemble.

Authors:  Rachael Winfree; Neal M Williams; Jonathan Dushoff; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 9.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E Vaissière; James H Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes.

Authors:  Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Arno Kuhn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.