Literature DB >> 16758219

Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence.

Catrin Westphal1, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Teja Tscharntke.   

Abstract

Coexistence in bumblebee communities has largely been investigated at local spatial scales. However, local resource partitioning does not fully explain the species diversity of bumblebee communities. Theoretical studies provide new evidence that partitioning of space can promote species coexistence, when species interact with their environment at different spatial scales. If bumblebee species possess specific foraging ranges, different spatial resource utilisation patterns might operate as an additional mechanism of coexistence in bumblebee communities. We investigated the effects of the landscape-wide availability of different resources (mass flowering crops and semi-natural habitats) on the local densities of four bumblebee species at 12 spatial scales (landscape sectors with 250-3,000 m radius) to indirectly identify the spatial scales at which the bumblebees perceive their environment. The densities of all bumblebee species were enhanced in landscapes with high proportions of mass flowering crops (mainly oilseed rape). We found the strongest effects for Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus lapidarius at large spatial scales, implying foraging distances of 3,000 and 2,750 m, respectively. The densities of Bombus pascuorum were most strongly influenced at a medium spatial scale (1,000 m), and of Bombus pratorum (with marginal significance) at a small spatial scale (250 m). The estimated foraging ranges tended to be related to body and colony sizes, indicating that larger species travel over larger distances than smaller species, presumably enabling them to build up larger colonies through a better exploitation of food resources. We conclude that coexistence in bumblebee communities could potentially be mediated by species-specific differences in the spatial resource utilisation patterns, which should be considered in conservation schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16758219     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0448-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity.

Authors:  M E Ritchie; H Olff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds.

Authors:  Todd M Palmer; Maureen L Stanton; Truman P Young
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Resource partitioning in ecological communities.

Authors:  T W Schoener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Conserving Europe's bees: why all the buzz?

Authors:  C S Williams
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Effects of flowering plant's patch size on species composition of pollinator communities, foraging strategies, and resource partitioning in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  Peter Sowig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: apidae).

Authors:  Michael A Bowers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators.

Authors:  R E Chapman; J Wang; A F G Bourke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Resource partitioning in bumble bees: the role of behavioral factors.

Authors:  D H Morse
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes.

Authors:  Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Arno Kuhn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  9 in total
  34 in total

1.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  New frontiers in competition for pollination.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca J Flanagan; Beverly J Brown; Nickolas M Waser; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Hierarchical spatial segregation of two Mediterranean vole species: the role of patch-network structure and matrix composition.

Authors:  Ricardo Pita; Xavier Lambin; António Mira; Pedro Beja
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A comparison of techniques for assessing farmland bumblebee populations.

Authors:  T J Wood; J M Holland; D Goulson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Diversity within mutualist guilds promotes coexistence and reduces the risk of invasion from an alien mutualist.

Authors:  Maria M Martignoni; Miranda M Hart; Rebecca C Tyson; Jimmy Garnier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effects of landscape composition and configuration on pollination in a native herb: a field experiment.

Authors:  Johan Ekroos; Anna Jakobsson; Joel Wideen; Lina Herbertsson; Maj Rundlöf; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Community structure, trophic position and reproductive mode of soil and bark-living oribatid mites in an alpine grassland ecosystem.

Authors:  Barbara M Fischer; Heinrich Schatz; Mark Maraun
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Does the invasive Lupinus polyphyllus increase pollinator visitation to a native herb through effects on pollinator population sizes?

Authors:  Anna Jakobsson; Benigno Padrón
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  A model for habitat selection and species distribution derived from central place foraging theory.

Authors:  Ola Olsson; Arvid Bolin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Small and surrounded: population size and land use intensity interact to determine reliance on autonomous selfing in a monocarpic plant.

Authors:  Rachel B Spigler
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.