Literature DB >> 33365131

Diverging landscape impacts on macronutrient status despite overlapping diets in managed (Apis mellifera) and native (Melissodes desponsa) bees.

Christina L Mogren1, María-Soledad Benítez2, Kevin McCarter3, Frédéric Boyer4, Jonathan G Lundgren5.   

Abstract

Declining pollinator populations worldwide are attributed to multiple stressors, including the loss of quality forage. Habitat management in agricultural areas often targets honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) specifically, with the assumption that native bees will benefit from an 'umbrella species' strategy. We tested this theory using a conservation physiology approach to compare the effects of landscape composition and floral dietary composition on the physiological status of honey bees and Melissodes desponsa in eastern South Dakota, USA. The total glycogen, lipid and protein concentrations were quantified from field collected bees. Next-generation sequencing of the trnL chloroplast gene from bee guts was used to evaluate dietary composition. The effects of landscape and dietary composition on macronutrient concentrations were compared between bee species. As the mean land-use patch area increased, honey bee glycogen levels increased, though M. desponsa experienced a decrease in glycogen. Protein levels decreased in honey bees as the largest patch index, a measure of single patch dominance, increased versus M. desponsa. Lipids in both species were unaffected by the measured landscape variables. Dietary analysis revealed that honey bees foraged preferentially on weedy non-native plant species, while M. desponsa sought out native and rarer species, in addition to utilizing non-native plants. Both species foraged on Asteraceae, Oleaceae and Fabaceae, specifically Melilotus sp. and Medicago sp. Dietary composition was not predictive of the macronutrients measured for either species. Together, these data highlight the management importance of including patch area in conservation recommendations, as bee species may have divergent physiological responses to landscape characteristics. While solitary bees may forage on weedy introduced plants in agricultural areas, robust strategies should also reincorporate native plant species, though they may not be preferred by honey bees, to maximize overall health and diversity of pollinator communities.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apidae; conservation physiology; dietary composition; honey bees; metabarcoding; nutrition

Year:  2020        PMID: 33365131      PMCID: PMC7745716          DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coaa109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Physiol        ISSN: 2051-1434            Impact factor:   3.079


  50 in total

1.  Rapid determination of glycogen and sugars in mosquitoes.

Authors:  E Van Handel
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 0.917

2.  obitools: a unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Frédéric Boyer; Céline Mercier; Aurélie Bonin; Yvan Le Bras; Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 7.090

3.  Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples.

Authors:  A Keller; N Danner; G Grimmer; M Ankenbrand; K von der Ohe; W von der Ohe; S Rost; S Härtel; I Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.081

4.  Floral Strips Attract Beneficial Insects but Do Not Enhance Yield in Cucumber Fields.

Authors:  N F Quinn; D C Brainard; Z Szendrei
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Honey bee workers that are pollen stressed as larvae become poor foragers and waggle dancers as adults.

Authors:  Hailey N Scofield; Heather R Mattila
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Application of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem.

Authors:  Rodney T Richardson; Chia-Hua Lin; Douglas B Sponsler; Juan O Quijia; Karen Goodell; Reed M Johnson
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  The effect of plant identity and mixed feeding on the detection of seed DNA in regurgitates of carabid beetles.

Authors:  Daniela Sint; Yasemin Guenay; Rebecca Mayer; Michael Traugott; Corinna Wallinger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Nutritional status of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) workers across an agricultural land-use gradient.

Authors:  Matthew D Smart; Clint R V Otto; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Multiplex-ready PCR: a new method for multiplexed SSR and SNP genotyping.

Authors:  Matthew J Hayden; Thao M Nguyen; Amanda Waterman; Kenneth J Chalmers
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Past role and future outlook of the Conservation Reserve Program for supporting honey bees in the Great Plains.

Authors:  Clint R V Otto; Haochi Zheng; Alisa L Gallant; Rich Iovanna; Benjamin L Carlson; Matthew D Smart; Skip Hyberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The threat of pesticide and disease co-exposure to managed and wild bee larvae.

Authors:  Monika Yordanova; Sophie E F Evison; Richard J Gill; Peter Graystock
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.674

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.