Literature DB >> 12764620

Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing.

Robert H R Bettman1, Adriaan F van Olphen, Frans W Zonneveld, Egbert H Huizing.   

Abstract

Three methods of determining electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees are studied: intraoperative counting of inserted electrodes, plain film radiography using Stenvers projection and postoperative electrode function testing. In 16 cases the number of electrodes inserted in the cochlea were counted both by the surgeon at surgery and by two independent observers on plain film radiographs using Stenvers projections. The electrode function was tested postoperatively. The differences between the three methods in estimation of the number of intracochlear electrodes were analyzed with t-tests, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the mean differences were calculated. The mean difference between the radiograph observers was 0.25 electrode (95% CI, -0.69 to 1.19 electrodes.) The mean difference between radiography observations and the surgical counts was 0.60 electrode (95% CI, -0.71 to 1.91 electrodes.) The mean difference between surgical counting and electrode function testing was 0.40 electrode (95% CI, -0.66 to 1.46 electrodes.) The mean difference between radiograph observations and electrode function testing was 0.50 electrode (95% CI, -0.51 to 1.51 electrodes.) No significant differences existed between the three methods. Our findings showed similar results in estimating electrode array insertion depth with the three methods. Plain film radiography using Stenvers projection is satisfactory if imaging is indicated for determining the number of inserted electrodes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12764620     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-003-0593-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

1.  [Postoperative conventional tomography of the temporal bone in the assessment of inadequate perception in patients with cochlear implants].

Authors:  S A Qaiyumi; P Hendrickx; E Bachor; R Laszig; B D Battmer; M Galanski
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1991-11

2.  Digital imaging: a valuable technique for the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J T Lawson; K Cranley; J G Toner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T.

Authors:  S Youssefzadeh; W Baumgartner; R Dorffner; W Gstöttner; S Trattnig
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Three-dimensional imaging of the temporal bone using a helical CT scan and its application in patients with cochlear implantation.

Authors:  T Himi; A Kataura; M Sakata; Y Odawara; J I Satoh; M Sawaishi
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Determining the optimum insertion length of electrodes in the cochlear 22-channel implant: results of a clinical study.

Authors:  K Kumakawa; H Takeda; N Ujita
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997

6.  Radiographic imaging for the cochlear implant.

Authors:  R A Rosenberg; N L Cohen; D L Reede
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Absence of radiofrequency heating from auditory implants during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C K Chou; J A McDougall; K W Can
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.010

8.  Insertion depth of the Nucleus electrode array and relative performance.

Authors:  R Hartrampf; M C Dahm; R D Battmer; D Gnadeberg; A Strauss-Schier; U Rost; T Lenarz
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

9.  In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  D R Ketten; M W Skinner; G Wang; M W Vannier; G A Gates; J G Neely
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1998-11

10.  Postoperative imaging of the multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  B A Shpizner; R A Holliday; J T Roland; N L Cohen; S B Waltzman; W H Shapiro
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incomplete and false tract insertions in cochlear implantation: retrospective review of surgical and auditory outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Andrea Fulcheri; Maurizio Guida; Antonio Caruso; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Imaging of electrode position in relation to electrode functioning after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Gijs K A van Wermeskerken; Adriaan F van Olphen; Kees Graamans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.