PURPOSE: To present the postoperative radiographic appearance of the multichannel cochlear implant and to suggest criteria for the radiographic evaluation of postimplant patients. METHODS: One hundred forty-one patients, 73 female and 68 male, had multichannel cochlear implants inserted. One hundred thirty-five intraoperative radiographs, 31 postoperative radiographic examinations, and 10 postoperative CT examinations were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In 135 patients, a Stenver's or anteroposterior projection confirmed the normal placement of the implant by demonstrating the electrodes to be regularly spaced and gently curved within the first turn of the cochlea. The insertion depth was determined by counting the number of electrodes that projected medial to the cochlear promontory. In 5 patients in whom intracochlear placement of the electrode array could not be confirmed on plain radiographs, CT demonstrated the location of the electrode array. In 3 patients with postoperative infections, CT either correctly identified or excluded the presence of a collection beneath the implant. CONCLUSION: Plain radiographs of the temporal bone are sufficient for the postoperative treatment of the majority of postimplant patients. CT should be performed when plain radiographs cannot adequately show the location of the electrode array or if postoperative infection is suspected.
PURPOSE: To present the postoperative radiographic appearance of the multichannel cochlear implant and to suggest criteria for the radiographic evaluation of postimplant patients. METHODS: One hundred forty-one patients, 73 female and 68 male, had multichannel cochlear implants inserted. One hundred thirty-five intraoperative radiographs, 31 postoperative radiographic examinations, and 10 postoperative CT examinations were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In 135 patients, a Stenver's or anteroposterior projection confirmed the normal placement of the implant by demonstrating the electrodes to be regularly spaced and gently curved within the first turn of the cochlea. The insertion depth was determined by counting the number of electrodes that projected medial to the cochlear promontory. In 5 patients in whom intracochlear placement of the electrode array could not be confirmed on plain radiographs, CT demonstrated the location of the electrode array. In 3 patients with postoperative infections, CT either correctly identified or excluded the presence of a collection beneath the implant. CONCLUSION: Plain radiographs of the temporal bone are sufficient for the postoperative treatment of the majority of postimplant patients. CT should be performed when plain radiographs cannot adequately show the location of the electrode array or if postoperative infection is suspected.
Authors: Robert H R Bettman; Adriaan F van Olphen; Frans W Zonneveld; Egbert H Huizing Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2003-05-23 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Rajiv Gupta; Soenke H Bartling; Samit K Basu; William R Ross; Hartmut Becker; Armin Pfoh; Thomas Brady; Hugh D Curtin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: R Cerini; N Faccioli; M Barillari; M De Iorio; M Carner; V Colletti; R Pozzi Mucelli Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Maja Svrakic; David R Friedmann; Phillip M Berman; Adam J Davis; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.311