Literature DB >> 12753222

Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Jeffrey C Glaubitz1, O Eugene Rhodes, J Andrew Dewoody.   

Abstract

An extraordinarily large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are now available in humans as well as in other model organisms. Technological advancements may soon make it feasible to assay hundreds of SNPs in virtually any organism of interest. One potential application of SNPs is the determination of pairwise genetic relationships in populations without known pedigrees. Although microsatellites are currently the marker of choice for this purpose, the number of independently segregating microsatellite markers that can be feasibly assayed is limited. Thus, it can be difficult to distinguish reliably some classes of relationship (e.g. full-sibs from half-sibs) with microsatellite data alone. We assess, via Monte Carlo computer simulation, the potential for using a large panel of independently segregating SNPs to infer genetic relationships, following the analytical approach of Blouin et al. (1996). We have explored a 'best case scenario' in which 100 independently segregating SNPs are available. For discrimination among single-generation relationships or for the identification of parent-offspring pairs, it appears that such a panel of moderately polymorphic SNPs (minor allele frequency of 0.20) will provide discrimination power equivalent to only 16-20 independently segregating microsatellites. Although newly available analytical methods that can account for tight genetic linkage between markers will, in theory, allow improved estimation of relationships using thousands of SNPs in highly dense genomic scans, in practice such studies will only be feasible in a handful of model organisms. Given the comparable amount of effort required for the development of both types of markers, it seems that microsatellites will remain the marker of choice for relationship estimation in nonmodel organisms, at least for the foreseeable future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12753222     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01790.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  29 in total

1.  Microsatellite standardization and evaluation of genotyping error in a large multi-partner research programme for conservation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.).

Authors:  J S Ellis; J Gilbey; A Armstrong; T Balstad; E Cauwelier; C Cherbonnel; S Consuegra; J Coughlan; T F Cross; W Crozier; E Dillane; D Ensing; C García de Leániz; E García-Vázquez; A M Griffiths; K Hindar; S Hjorleifsdottir; D Knox; G Machado-Schiaffino; P McGinnity; D Meldrup; E E Nielsen; K Olafsson; C R Primmer; P Prodohl; L Stradmeyer; J-P Vähä; E Verspoor; V Wennevik; J R Stevens
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Genomics and the future of conservation genetics.

Authors:  Fred W Allendorf; Paul A Hohenlohe; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson; John Carlos Garza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations.

Authors:  Stuart C Thomas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Novel single nucleotide polymorphism identification in interleukin-6 gene of Pakistani sheep.

Authors:  Safdar Ali; Masroor Ellahi Babar; A Hossain Farid; Pervez Akhtar; Ali Raza Awan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies.

Authors:  E Bomcke; N Gengler
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A Genealogical Look at Shared Ancestry on the X Chromosome.

Authors:  Vince Buffalo; Stephen M Mount; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Development of SNP Panels as a New Tool to Assess the Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Parentage Analysis of the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica).

Authors:  Wilawan Thongda; Honggang Zhao; Dongdong Zhang; Lauren N Jescovitch; Ming Liu; Ximing Guo; Meagan Schrandt; Sean P Powers; Eric Peatman
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  High frequencies of de novo CNVs in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Dheeraj Malhotra; Shane McCarthy; Jacob J Michaelson; Vladimir Vacic; Katherine E Burdick; Seungtai Yoon; Sven Cichon; Aiden Corvin; Sydney Gary; Elliot S Gershon; Michael Gill; Maria Karayiorgou; John R Kelsoe; Olga Krastoshevsky; Verena Krause; Ellen Leibenluft; Deborah L Levy; Vladimir Makarov; Abhishek Bhandari; Anil K Malhotra; Francis J McMahon; Markus M Nöthen; James B Potash; Marcella Rietschel; Thomas G Schulze; Jonathan Sebat
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.