PURPOSE: To assess the influence of local anatomic noise on the detection of subtle lung nodules depicted on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six 8 x 8-cm lung regions were extracted from digital chest radiographs obtained in healthy subjects. Simulated nodules emulating the radiographic characteristics of subtle tissue-equivalent lesions 3.2-6.4 mm in diameter (equivalent to 0.1-0.4 mm in contrast-diameter product [CD]) were added to the images. On multiple renditions of each image, nodules were inserted at slightly different locations within 6 mm of the center; this process allowed different local background patterns to overlie the nodules. An observer detection study involving 15 experienced radiologists was performed. The authors performed analysis of variance and pairwise t test analyses to determine variations in nodule detectability related to nodule location and size on each image. RESULTS: Results indicated a strong correlation between nodule size and observer detection score and significant variation in nodule detectability as a function of location. Changes in nodule position caused observer score variations that were equivalent to the variation caused by an up to 185% change in nodule CD (78% average over all six images), an up to 68% change in diameter (32% average), and an up to 28% change in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) (14% average). CONCLUSION: Local anatomic variations surrounding and overlying a subtle lung nodule on a chest radiograph that are created by the projection of anatomic features in the thorax, such as ribs and pulmonary vessels, can greatly influence the detection of nodules, altering the Az by as much as 28%.
PURPOSE: To assess the influence of local anatomic noise on the detection of subtle lung nodules depicted on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six 8 x 8-cm lung regions were extracted from digital chest radiographs obtained in healthy subjects. Simulated nodules emulating the radiographic characteristics of subtle tissue-equivalent lesions 3.2-6.4 mm in diameter (equivalent to 0.1-0.4 mm in contrast-diameter product [CD]) were added to the images. On multiple renditions of each image, nodules were inserted at slightly different locations within 6 mm of the center; this process allowed different local background patterns to overlie the nodules. An observer detection study involving 15 experienced radiologists was performed. The authors performed analysis of variance and pairwise t test analyses to determine variations in nodule detectability related to nodule location and size on each image. RESULTS: Results indicated a strong correlation between nodule size and observer detection score and significant variation in nodule detectability as a function of location. Changes in nodule position caused observer score variations that were equivalent to the variation caused by an up to 185% change in nodule CD (78% average over all six images), an up to 68% change in diameter (32% average), and an up to 28% change in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) (14% average). CONCLUSION: Local anatomic variations surrounding and overlying a subtle lung nodule on a chest radiograph that are created by the projection of anatomic features in the thorax, such as ribs and pulmonary vessels, can greatly influence the detection of nodules, altering the Az by as much as 28%.
Authors: Sarah J Boyce; H Page McAdams; Carl E Ravin; Edward F Patz; Lacey Washington; Santiago Martinez; Lynne Koweek; Ehsan Samei Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Juergen Biederer; Tobias Gottwald; Hendrik Bolte; Christian Riedel; Sandra Freitag; Richard Van Metter; Martin Heller Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-09-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sara A Asplund; Åse A Johnsson; Jenny Vikgren; Angelica Svalkvist; Agneta Flinck; Marianne Boijsen; Valeria A Fisichella; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Grace J Gang; Junghoon Lee; J Webster Stayman; Daniel J Tward; W Zbijewski; Jerry L Prince; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.071