Literature DB >> 24792590

Effect of radiation dose level on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis.

Sara A Asplund1, Åse A Johnsson, Jenny Vikgren, Angelica Svalkvist, Agneta Flinck, Marianne Boijsen, Valeria A Fisichella, Lars Gunnar Månsson, Magnus Båth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis at reduced radiation dose levels.
METHODS: Eighty-six patients were included in the study and were examined with tomosynthesis and computed tomography (CT). Artificial noise was added to simulate that the tomosynthesis images were acquired at dose levels corresponding to 12, 32, and 70% of the default setting effective dose (0.12 mSv). Three observers (with >20, >20 and three years of experience) read the tomosynthesis cases for presence of nodules in a free-response receiver operating characteristics (FROC) study. CT served as reference. Differences between dose levels were calculated using the jack-knife alternative FROC (JAFROC) figure of merit (FOM).
RESULTS: The JAFROC FOM was 0.45, 0.54, 0.55, and 0.54 for the 12, 32, 70, and 100% dose levels, respectively. The differences in FOM between the 12% dose level and the 32, 70, and 100% dose levels were 0.087 (p = 0.006), 0.099 (p = 0.003), and 0.093 (p = 0.004), respectively. Between higher dose levels, no significant differences were found.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial reduction from the default setting dose in chest tomosynthesis may be possible. In the present study, no statistically significant difference in detectability of pulmonary nodules was found when reducing the radiation dose to 32%. KEY POINTS: • A substantial radiation dose reduction in chest tomosynthesis may be possible. • Pulmonary nodule detectability remained unchanged at 32% of the effective dose. • Tomosynthesis might be performed at the dose of a lateral chest radiograph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24792590     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3182-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  43 in total

Review 1.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging.

Authors:  Anders Tingberg
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.

Authors:  Markus Håkansson; Magnus Båth; Sara Börjesson; Susanne Kheddache; Anna Grahn; Mark Ruschin; Anders Tingberg; Sören Mattsson; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial.

Authors:  Magnus Båth; Markus Håkansson; Sara Börjesson; Susanne Kheddache; Anna Grahn; Mark Ruschin; Anders Tingberg; Sören Mattsson; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.

Authors:  Sara Börjesson; Markus Håkansson; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Sune Svensson; Anders Tingberg; Anna Grahn; Mark Ruschin; Bengt Hemdal; Sören Mattsson; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

7.  A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.

Authors:  John M Sabol
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.

Authors:  Markus Håkansson; Sune Svensson; Sara Zachrisson; Angelica Svalkvist; Magnus Båth; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Tomosynthesis for the early detection of pulmonary emphysema: diagnostic performance compared with chest radiography, using multidetector computed tomography as reference.

Authors:  Yoshitake Yamada; Masahiro Jinzaki; Masahiro Hashimoto; Eisuke Shiomi; Takayuki Abe; Sachio Kuribayashi; Kenji Ogawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases.

Authors:  Jenny Vikgren; Sara Zachrisson; Angelica Svalkvist; Ase A Johnsson; Marianne Boijsen; Agneta Flinck; Susanne Kheddache; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new system for chest tomosynthesis: aspects of image quality of different protocols determined using an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  M Jadidi; A Sundin; P Aspelin; M Båth; S Nyrén
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of digital tomosynthesis and computed tomography for lung nodule detection in SOS screening program.

Authors:  Maurizio Grosso; Roberto Priotto; Donatella Ghirardo; Alberto Talenti; Emanuele Roberto; Luca Bertolaccini; Alberto Terzi; Stéphane Chauvie
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  EFFECT OF RADIATION DOSE LEVEL ON ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF MANUAL SIZE MEASUREMENTS IN CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS EVALUATED USING SIMULATED PULMONARY NODULES.

Authors:  Christina Söderman; Åse Allansdotter Johnsson; Jenny Vikgren; Rauni Rossi Norrlund; David Molnar; Angelica Svalkvist; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  VISIBILITY OF STRUCTURES OF RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS: INFLUENCE OF ANATOMICAL LOCATION AND OBSERVER EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  Carin Meltzer; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Helga Ásgeirsdóttir; Marita Gilljam; Åse Allansdotter Johnsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.