Literature DB >> 25339791

ANIMAL ANALOGIES IN FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF FACES.

Leslie A Zebrowitz1, Heather A Wadlinger1, Victor X Luevano1, Benjamin M White1, Cai Xing1, Yi Zhang1.   

Abstract

Analogies between humans and animals based on facial resemblance have a long history. We report evidence for reverse anthropomorphism and the extension of facial stereotypes to lions, foxes, and dogs. In the stereotype extension, more positive traits were attributed to animals judged more attractive than con-specifics; more childlike traits were attributed to those judged more babyfaced. In the reverse anthropomorphism, human faces with more resemblance to lions, ascertained by connectionist modeling of facial metrics, were judged more dominant, cold, and shrewd, controlling attractiveness, babyfaceness, and sex. Faces with more resemblance to Labradors were judged warmer and less shrewd. Resemblance to foxes did not predict impressions. Results for lions and dogs were consistent with trait impressions of these animals and support the species overgeneralization hypothesis that evolutionarily adaptive reactions to particular animals are overgeneralized, with people perceived to have traits associated with animals their faces resemble. Other possible explanations are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 25339791      PMCID: PMC4203438          DOI: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.4.486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn        ISSN: 0278-016X


  16 in total

1.  It's not just average faces that are attractive: computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive.

Authors:  Jamin Halberstadt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Trait impressions as overgeneralized responses to adaptively significant facial qualities: evidence from connectionist modeling.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Jean-Marc Fellous; Alain Mignault; Carrie Andreoletti
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2003

3.  Why do fear and anger look the way they do? Form and social function in facial expressions.

Authors:  Abigail A Marsh; Reginald B Adams; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01

Review 4.  Dehumanization: an integrative review.

Authors:  Nick Haslam
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2006

5.  Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth.

Authors:  J B Pittenger; R E Shaw; L S Mark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Facial resemblance to emotions: group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Masako Kikuchi; Jean-Marc Fellous
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-02

8.  Animal evolution during domestication: the domesticated fox as a model.

Authors:  Lyudmila Trut; Irina Oskina; Anastasiya Kharlamova
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick; Catherine J Mondloch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-08-14

10.  Canine analogs of human personality factors.

Authors:  T W Draper
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1995-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  What's in a face? The role of facial features in ratings of dominance, threat, and stereotypicality.

Authors:  Heather Kleider-Offutt; Ashley M Meacham; Lee Branum-Martin; Megan Capodanno
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-08-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.