Literature DB >> 12743836

Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs ceramic partial crowns.

J Wagner1, K-A Hiller, G Schmalz.   

Abstract

Cast gold partial crowns (CGPC) are an accepted means of restoring posterior teeth. For aesthetic reasons, gold alloys are being increasingly substituted with ceramics. The aim of the present study was to investigate retrospectively the long-term clinical performance and survival of CGPC and compare the results to the ones already reported for ceramic partial crowns (CPC). The CGPC group consisted of 42 patients (24 male, 18 female) randomly sampled from a total of 106 patients with CGPC, with one restoration per patient. The CPC group consisted of 22 patients with a total of 42 restorations. Both types of restoration were done by one experienced dentist. Another two experienced dentists who were not involved in performing the restorations rated both kinds of partial crowns using the modified United State Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria [14]. The Median age of the CGPC was 57 months (range 3-157) and of the CPC and 63 months (range 24-72). Forty-one (98%) of the CGPC and 27 (64%) of the CPC were placed in molars, the rest in premolars. In each group, 40 (95%) restorations were still functioning without any necessity of replacement. Two teeth with CGPC, in situ for 4.5 and 11 years, respectively, had been extracted for periodontal reasons. Two CPC fractured and had to be replaced after 2 and 6.5 years in situ. The USPHS criteria results were similarly good for the gold and ceramic groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed survival probabilities of 72+/-21% and 96+/-4% after 13 and 7 years, respectively, for the CGPC. Survival of the CPC was 81+/-15% after 7 years. No statistically significant difference among survival functions of CGPC and CPC was found. From this data, it can be concluded that the longevity of CPC is not inferior to that of gold alloys. However, more long-term studies comparing the clinical performance and longevity of these two types of indirect restoration in the posterior region with larger numbers of restorations are desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12743836     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-003-0205-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  13 in total

1.  IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.

Authors:  N Krämer; R Frankenberger; M Pelka; A Petschelt
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years.

Authors:  A Felden; G Schmalz; K A Hiller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years.

Authors:  I Krejci; D Krejci; F Lutz
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.677

4.  Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays.

Authors:  S Studer; C Lehner; U Brodbeck; P Schärer
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Dentine hypersensitivity and the placebo response. A comparison of the effect of strontium acetate, potassium nitrate and fluoride toothpastes.

Authors:  N X West; M Addy; R J Jackson; D B Ridge
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns--a retrospective study at a dental school clinic.

Authors:  R Stoll; M Sieweke; K Pieper; V Stachniss; A Schulte
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years.

Authors:  K J Donly; M E Jensen; P Triolo; D Chan
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  Clinical criteria.

Authors:  G Ryge
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.

Authors:  T E Donovan; W W Chee
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1993-07

10.  [Motivation and education].

Authors:  U P Saxer; H R Mühlemann
Journal:  SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd       Date:  1975-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity--a scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; C Sipos; K-A Hiller; B Thonemann; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resins compared to resin cements with etch and rinse adhesives to enamel and dentin in vitro.

Authors:  A-K Lührs; S Guhr; H Günay; W Geurtsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Statistical failure analysis of adhesive resin cement bonded dental ceramics.

Authors:  Yaou Wang; Noriko Katsube; Robert R Seghi; Stanislav I Rokhlin
Journal:  Eng Fract Mech       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Influence of different cusp coverage methods for the extension of ceramic inlays on marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.

Authors:  Stephanie Krifka; Martin Stangl; Sarah Wiesbauer; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz; Marianne Federlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years.

Authors:  Frederike Schenke; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Daniel Moder; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Two-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Tobias Männer; Karl-Anton Hiller; Sebastian Schmidt; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Three-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  M Federlin; J Wagner; T Männer; K-A Hiller; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Clinical acceptability of metal-ceramic fixed partial dental prosthesis fabricated with direct metal laser sintering technique-5 year follow-up.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Prabhu; Geetha Prabhu; Eswaran Baskaran; Eswaran M Arumugam
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.