Literature DB >> 1641459

Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years.

I Krejci1, D Krejci, F Lutz.   

Abstract

Ten IPS/Empress pressed glass ceramic inlays were cemented in box-shaped, non-beveled, Class II, posterior cavities. They were evaluated clinically according to modified US Public Health Service criteria after 1.5 years in vivo. In addition, quantitative marginal analysis was performed immediately after placement of the inlays and at the 1.5-year recall. Clinical evaluation revealed that the inlays performed well after 1.5 years; all inlays received scores of Alfa or Beta for all criteria evaluated. Scanning electron microscopic examination indicated that the excellent initial marginal adaptation decreased significantly over 1.5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1641459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  8 in total

1.  What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Systematic review of ceramic inlays.

Authors:  M Hayashi; N H F Wilson; C A Yeung; H V Worthington
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years.

Authors:  Frederike Schenke; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Daniel Moder; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Two-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Tobias Männer; Karl-Anton Hiller; Sebastian Schmidt; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  J Wagner; K-A Hiller; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Three-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns.

Authors:  M Federlin; J Wagner; T Männer; K-A Hiller; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Clinical Evaluation of Time Efficiency and Fit Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns between Conventional and Digital Impression.

Authors:  Ji-Su Park; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.