Literature DB >> 12699514

The effect of heat and moisture exchanger on humidity and body temperature in a low-flow anaesthesia system.

A Johansson1, D Lundberg, H H Luttropp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial humidification of dry inspired gases seems to reduce the drop in body temperature during surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the humidity and temperature of anaesthetic gases with heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs). The secondary aim was to evaluate if HMEs in combination with low-flow anaesthesia could prevent a decrease in the body temperature during general anaesthesia.
METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for general surgery were randomised to receive a fresh gas flow of 1.0, 3.0 or 6.0 l min-1 with or without HMEs in a circle anaesthesia system. Relative humidity, absolute humidity, temperature of inspired gases and body temperatures were measured during 120 min of anaesthesia.
RESULTS: The inspiratory absolute humidity levels with HMEs were 32.7 +/- 3.1, 32.1 +/- 1.1 and 29.2 +/- 1.9 mg H2O l(-1) and 26.6 +/- 2.3, 22.6 +/- 3.0 and 13.0 +/- 2.6 mg H2O l(-1) without HMEs after 120 min of anaesthesia with 1.0, 3.0, or 6.0 l min(-1) fresh gas flows (P < 0.05, between with and without HME). The relative humidity levels with HMEs were 93.8 +/- 3.3, 92.7 +/- 2.2 and 90.7 +/- 3.5%, and without the HMEs 95.2 +/- 4.5, 86.8 +/- 8.0 and 52.8 +/- 9.8% (P < 0.05, between with and without HMEs in the 3.0 and 6.0 l min(-1) groups). The inspiratory gas temperatures with HMEs were 32.5 +/- 2.0, 32.4 +/- 0.5 and 31.0 +/- 1.9 degrees C, and 28.4 +/- 1.5, 27.1 +/- 0.8 and 26.1 +/- 0.6 degrees C without HMEs after 120 min of anaesthesia (P < 0.05, between with and without HME). The tympanic membrane temperatures at 120 min of anaesthesia were 35.8 +/- 0.6, 35.5 +/- 0.6 and 35.4 +/- 0.8 degrees C in the groups with HMEs, and 35.8 +/- 0.6, 35.3 +/- 0.7 and 35.3 +/- 0.9 degrees C in the groups without the HMEs (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The HMEs improved the inspiratory absolute humidity, relative humidity and temperature of the anaesthetic gases during different fresh gas flows. However, the HMEs were not able to prevent a body temperature drop during low-flow anaesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699514     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00108.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of a heat and moisture exchanger in inhalation anesthesia at two different flow rates.

Authors:  Koichi Yamashita; Takeshi Yokoyama; Hidehiro Abe; Tomoki Nishiyama; Masanobu Manabe
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Effectiveness of heat moisture exchangers (hmes) in preventing perioperative hypothermia among adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general endotracheal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Nc Anaegbu; Oj Olatosi; Ku Tobi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

3.  Humidity and measurement of volatile propofol using MCC-IMS (EDMON).

Authors:  Tobias Teucke; F Maurer; L M Müller-Wirtz; T Volk; D I Sessler; S Kreuer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  The effect of heat-moisture exchanger and closed-circuit technique on airway climate during desflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Chih-Cherng Lu; Shung-Tai Ho; Wen-Jinn Liaw; Ruei-Ming Chen; Ta-Liang Chen; Chung-Yuan Lin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Comparison of the temperature and humidity in the anesthetic breathing circuit among different anesthetic workstations: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.

Authors:  Yoon Ji Choi; Sam Hong Min; Jeong Jun Park; Jang Eun Cho; Seung Zhoo Yoon; Suk Min Yoon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The Humidity in a Low-Flow Dräger Fabius Anesthesia Workstation with or without Thermal Insulation or a Heat and Moisture Exchanger: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sergius A R de Oliveira; Lorena M C Lucio; Norma S P Modolo; Yoko Hayashi; Mariana G Braz; Lídia R de Carvalho; Leandro G Braz; José Reinaldo C Braz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Breath biopsy of breast cancer using sensor array signals and machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yu Yang; Yi-Chia Wang; Hsin-Yi Peng; Chi-Hsiang Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of different fresh gas flows and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity in surgical patients: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Irem Gumus Ozcan; Ozkan Onal; Aysun Ozdemirkan; Ali Saltali; Mehmet Sari
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.