Literature DB >> 33420275

Breath biopsy of breast cancer using sensor array signals and machine learning analysis.

Hsiao-Yu Yang1,2, Yi-Chia Wang3,4, Hsin-Yi Peng1, Chi-Hsiang Huang5,6.   

Abstract

Breast cancer causes metabolic alteration, and volatile metabolites in the breath of patients may be used to diagnose breast cancer. The objective of this study was to develop a new breath test for breast cancer by analyzing volatile metabolites in the exhaled breath. We collected alveolar air from breast cancer patients and non-cancer controls and analyzed the volatile metabolites with an electronic nose composed of 32 carbon nanotubes sensors. We used machine learning techniques to build prediction models for breast cancer and its molecular phenotyping. Between July 2016 and June 2018, we enrolled a total of 899 subjects. Using the random forest model, the prediction accuracy of breast cancer in the test set was 91% (95% CI: 0.85-0.95), sensitivity was 86%, specificity was 97%, positive predictive value was 97%, negative predictive value was 97%, the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00), and the kappa value was 0.83. The leave-one-out cross-validated discrimination accuracy and reliability of molecular phenotyping of breast cancer were 88.5 ± 12.1% and 0.77 ± 0.23, respectively. Breath tests with electronic noses can be applied intraoperatively to discriminate breast cancer and molecular subtype and support the medical staff to choose the best therapeutic decision.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33420275      PMCID: PMC7794369          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80570-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  43 in total

1.  Prediction of breast cancer using volatile biomarkers in the breath.

Authors:  Michael Phillips; Renee N Cataneo; Beth Ann Ditkoff; Peter Fisher; Joel Greenberg; Ratnasiri Gunawardena; C Stephan Kwon; Olaf Tietje; Cynthia Wong
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  E-Nose system for anesthetic dose level detection using artificial neural network.

Authors:  Hamdi Melih Saraoğlu; Burçak Edin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Human exhaled air analytics: biomarkers of diseases.

Authors:  Bogusław Buszewski; Martyna Kesy; Tomasz Ligor; Anton Amann
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.902

4.  Sample size and statistical power considerations in high-dimensionality data settings: a comparative study of classification algorithms.

Authors:  Yu Guo; Armin Graber; Robert N McBurney; Raji Balasubramanian
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors.

Authors:  G Peng; M Hakim; Y Y Broza; S Billan; R Abdah-Bortnyak; A Kuten; U Tisch; H Haick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Molecular subtypes of breast cancer emerging in young women in Taiwan: evidence for more than just westernization as a reason for the disease in Asia.

Authors:  Ching-Hung Lin; Jau-Yu Liau; Yen-Shen Lu; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Wei-Chung Lee; Kuan-Ting Kuo; Ying-Chun Shen; Sung-Hsin Kuo; Chieh Lan; Jacqueline Ming Liu; Wun-Hon Kuo; King-Jen Chang; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Pooled Analysis of Nine Cohorts Reveals Breast Cancer Risk Factors by Tumor Molecular Subtype.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Gretchen L Gierach; Brian D Carter; Juhua Luo; Roger L Milne; Elisabete Weiderpass; Graham G Giles; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen; Bernard Rosner; Alicja Wolk; Hans-Olov Adami; Karen L Margolis; Susan M Gapstur; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  The role of balanced training and testing data sets for binary classifiers in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Qiong Wei; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Šimundić
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2009-01-20
View more
  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Noses in Cancer Diagnoses Using Exhaled Breath: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 2.  Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis as a Potential Novel Screening Tool for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michelle Leemans; Pierre Bauër; Vincent Cuzuel; Etienne Audureau; Isabelle Fromantin
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashley Kim; Karen C Chung; Christopher Keir; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  Colorimetric and Electrochemical Screening for Early Detection of Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Retinopathy-Application of Sensor Arrays and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Georgina Faura; Gerard Boix-Lemonche; Anne Kristin Holmeide; Rasa Verkauskiene; Vallo Volke; Jelizaveta Sokolovska; Goran Petrovski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Accuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yu Yang; Wan-Chin Chen; Rodger-Chen Tsai
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-22

Review 6.  Diagnostic Approaches For COVID-19: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward.

Authors:  Maha Alafeef; Dipanjan Pan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 18.027

7.  Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lisa Goudman; Julie Jansen; Nieke Vets; Ann De Smedt; Maarten Moens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.