Literature DB >> 36129642

Humidity and measurement of volatile propofol using MCC-IMS (EDMON).

Tobias Teucke1, F Maurer2, L M Müller-Wirtz2, T Volk2, D I Sessler3, S Kreuer2.   

Abstract

The bedside Exhaled Drug MONitor - EDMON measures exhaled propofol in ppbv every minute based on multi-capillary column - ion mobility spectrometry (MCC-IMS). The MCC pre-separates gas samples, thereby reducing the influence of the high humidity in human breath. However, preliminary analyses identified substantial measurement deviations between dry and humid calibration standards. We therefore performed an analytical validation of the EDMON to evaluate the influence of humidity on measurement performance. A calibration gas generator was used to generate gaseous propofol standards measured by an EDMON device to assess linearity, precision, carry-over, resolution, and the influence of different levels of humidity at 100% and 1.7% (without additional) relative humidity (reference temperature: 37°C). EDMON measurements were roughly half the actual concentration without additional humidity and roughly halved again at 100% relative humidity. Standard concentrations and EDMON values correlated linearly at 100% relative humidity (R²=0.97). The measured values were stable over 100min with a variance ≤ 10% in over 96% of the measurements. Carry-over effects were low with 5% at 100% relative humidity after 5min of equilibration. EDMON measurement resolution at 100% relative humidity was 0.4 and 0.6 ppbv for standard concentrations of 3 ppbv and 41 ppbv. The influence of humidity on measurement performance was best described by a second-order polynomial function (R²≥0.99) with influence reaching a maximum at about 70% relative humidity. We conclude that EDMON measurements are strongly influenced by humidity and should therefore be corrected for sample humidity to obtain accurate estimates of exhaled propofol concentrations.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaesthesia; Drug monitoring.; EDMON; Exhaled propofol; Ion mobility spectrometry; MCC-IMS

Year:  2022        PMID: 36129642     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00907-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  15 in total

1.  Adherence of volatile propofol to various types of plastic tubing.

Authors:  F Maurer; D J Lorenz; G Pielsticker; T Volk; D I Sessler; J I Baumbach; S Kreuer
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.262

2.  The effect of humidity on sensitivity of amine detection in ion mobility spectrometry.

Authors:  M Mäkinen; M Sillanpää; A-K Viitanen; A Knap; J M Mäkelä; J Puton
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 6.057

3.  Prospective clinical validation of the Eleveld propofol pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model in general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Remco Vellinga; Laura N Hannivoort; Michele Introna; Daan J Touw; Anthony R Absalom; Douglas J Eleveld; Michel M R F Struys
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Drug detection in breath: effects of pulmonary blood flow and cardiac output on propofol exhalation.

Authors:  Svend Kamysek; Patricia Fuchs; Henny Schwoebel; Jan P Roesner; Sabine Kischkel; Kathi Wolter; Christian Loeseken; Jochen K Schubert; Wolfram Miekisch
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Humidity of anaesthetic gases with respect to low flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  P P Kleemann
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.669

6.  Propofol Breath Monitoring as a Potential Tool to Improve the Prediction of Intraoperative Plasma Concentrations.

Authors:  Pieter Colin; Douglas J Eleveld; Johannes P van den Berg; Hugo E M Vereecke; Michel M R F Struys; Gustav Schelling; Christian C Apfel; Cyrill Hornuss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation.

Authors:  D J Eleveld; P Colin; A R Absalom; M M R F Struys
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Evaluation of the predictive performance of four pharmacokinetic models for propofol.

Authors:  J B Glen; F Servin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Humidity Effect on the Drift Times of the Reactant Ions in Ion Mobility Spectrometry.

Authors:  Zahra Izadi; Mahmoud Tabrizchi; Helko Borsdorf; Hossein Farrokhpour
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  On-line monitoring of end-tidal propofol concentration in anesthetized patients.

Authors:  Akira Takita; Kenichi Masui; Tomiei Kazama
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.