OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether parameters describing pulmonary gas exchange (shunt and ventilation-perfusion mismatch) can be estimated consistently by the use of non-invasive data as input to a mathematical model of oxygen transport. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Investigations were carried out in the post-anaesthesia care unit, coronary care unit, and intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Data from ninety-five patients and six normal subjects were included for the comparison. The clinical situations differed, ranging from healthy subjects to patients with acute respiratory failure in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS: The experimental procedure involved changing the inspired oxygen fraction (F(I)O(2)) in 4-6 steps in order to obtain arterial oxygen saturations (S(a)O(2)) in the range from 90-100%. This procedure allows plotting a F(I)O(2)/S(a)O(2) or F(E)O(2)/S(a)O(2) curve, the shape and position of which was quantified using the mathematical model estimating pulmonary shunt and a measure of ventilation-perfusion mismatch (DeltaPO(2)). This procedure was performed using either arterial blood samples at each F(I)O(2) level (invasive approach) or using values from the pulse oximeter (non-invasive approach). MAIN RESULTS: The model provided good fit to data using both the invasive and non-invasive experimental approach. The parameter estimates were linearly correlated with highly significant correlation coefficients; shunt(invasive) vs shunt(non-invasive), r(2) = 0.74, P <0.01, and DeltaPO(2)(invasive) vs DeltaPO(2)(non-invasive), r(2) = 0.97, P <0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary gas exchange can be described equally well using non-invasive data. The simplicity of the non-invasive approach makes the method suitable for large-scale clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether parameters describing pulmonary gas exchange (shunt and ventilation-perfusion mismatch) can be estimated consistently by the use of non-invasive data as input to a mathematical model of oxygen transport. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Investigations were carried out in the post-anaesthesia care unit, coronary care unit, and intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Data from ninety-five patients and six normal subjects were included for the comparison. The clinical situations differed, ranging from healthy subjects to patients with acute respiratory failure in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS: The experimental procedure involved changing the inspired oxygen fraction (F(I)O(2)) in 4-6 steps in order to obtain arterial oxygen saturations (S(a)O(2)) in the range from 90-100%. This procedure allows plotting a F(I)O(2)/S(a)O(2) or F(E)O(2)/S(a)O(2) curve, the shape and position of which was quantified using the mathematical model estimating pulmonary shunt and a measure of ventilation-perfusion mismatch (DeltaPO(2)). This procedure was performed using either arterial blood samples at each F(I)O(2) level (invasive approach) or using values from the pulse oximeter (non-invasive approach). MAIN RESULTS: The model provided good fit to data using both the invasive and non-invasive experimental approach. The parameter estimates were linearly correlated with highly significant correlation coefficients; shunt(invasive) vs shunt(non-invasive), r(2) = 0.74, P <0.01, and DeltaPO(2)(invasive) vs DeltaPO(2)(non-invasive), r(2) = 0.97, P <0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary gas exchange can be described equally well using non-invasive data. The simplicity of the non-invasive approach makes the method suitable for large-scale clinical use.
Authors: S Kjaergaard; S E Rees; J A Nielsen; M Freundlich; P Thorgaard; S Andreassen Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: S Andreassen; S E Rees; S Kjaergaard; P Thorgaard; S M Winter; C J Morgan; P Alstrup; E Toft Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoît Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: S E Rees; C Allerød; D Murley; Y Zhao; B W Smith; S Kjaergaard; P Thorgaard; S Andreassen Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: J Moesgaard; J Hedegaard Kristensen; J Malczynski; C Holst-Hansen; S Edward Rees; D Murley; S Andreassen; J Brondum Frokjaer; E Toft Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Lars P Thomsen; Dan S Karbing; Bram W Smith; David Murley; Ulla M Weinreich; Søren Kjærgaard; Egon Toft; Per Thorgaard; Steen Andreassen; Stephen E Rees Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Lars P Thomsen; Ulla M Weinreich; Dan S Karbing; Peter D Wagner; Stephen E Rees Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 2.502