Literature DB >> 12696919

Metabolite profiling of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) using 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool to detect potential unintended effects following a genetic modification.

Gwénaëlle Le Gall1, Ian J Colquhoun, Adrienne L Davis, Geoff J Collins, Martine E Verhoeyen.   

Abstract

The maize transcription factors LC and C1 were simultaneously overexpressed in tomato with the aim of producing lines with increased amounts of flavonols. The metabolite composition of these genetically modified tomatoes has been compared with that of azygous (nonmodified) controls grown side-by-side under the same conditions. It has been possible to observe metabolic changes in both types at different stages of maturity. (1)H NMR spectra showed that the levels of glutamic acid, fructose, and some nucleosides and nucleotides gradually increase from the immature to the ripe stage, whereas some amino acids such as valine and gamma-aminobutyric acid were present in higher amounts in unripe tomatoes. Apart from the significantly increased content of six main flavonoid glycosides (mainly kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, with additional increases in kaempferol-3,7-di-O-glucoside (1), kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside-7-O-glucoside (2), kaempferol-3-O-glucoside, a dihydrokaempferol-O-hexoside (3), and naringenin-7-O-glucoside), the levels of at least 15 other metabolites were found to be different between the two types of red tomato. Among them were citric acid, sucrose, phenylalanine, and trigonelline. However, although statistically significant, these changes in mean values were relatively minor (less than 3-fold) and within the natural variation that would be observed in a field-grown crop. Nevertheless, this study clearly showed that NMR combined with chemometrics and univariate statistics can successfully trace even small differences in metabolite levels between plants and therefore represents a powerful tool to detect potential unintended effects in genetically modified crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12696919     DOI: 10.1021/jf0259967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  37 in total

Review 1.  Metabolomics and its role in understanding cellular responses in plants.

Authors:  Ritu Bhalla; Kothandaraman Narasimhan; Sanjay Swarup
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 2.  Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

Authors:  Agnès E Ricroch; Jean B Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  NMR-based metabolomic analysis of plants.

Authors:  Hye Kyong Kim; Young Hae Choi; Robert Verpoorte
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolome database for tomato.

Authors:  Sofia Moco; Raoul J Bino; Oscar Vorst; Harrie A Verhoeven; Joost de Groot; Teris A van Beek; Jacques Vervoort; C H Ric de Vos
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  NMR analysis of plant nitrogen metabolism.

Authors:  F Mesnard; R G Ratcliffe
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Characterization of tryptophan-overproducing potato transgenic for a mutant rice anthranilate synthase alpha-subunit gene (OASA1D).

Authors:  Fumio Matsuda; Tetsuya Yamada; Haruna Miyazawa; Hisashi Miyagawa; Kyo Wakasa
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Metabolic network fluxes in heterotrophic Arabidopsis cells: stability of the flux distribution under different oxygenation conditions.

Authors:  Thomas C R Williams; Laurent Miguet; Shyam K Masakapalli; Nicholas J Kruger; Lee J Sweetlove; R George Ratcliffe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Characterization of GMO or glyphosate effects on the composition of maize grain and maize-based diet for rat feeding.

Authors:  Stéphane Bernillon; Mickaël Maucourt; Catherine Deborde; Sylvain Chéreau; Daniel Jacob; Nathalie Priymenko; Bérengère Laporte; Xavier Coumoul; Bernard Salles; Peter M Rogowsky; Florence Richard-Forget; Annick Moing
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.290

9.  Comparison of transgenic Gerbera hybrida lines and traditional varieties shows no differences in cytotoxicity or metabolic fingerprints.

Authors:  Miia Marika Ainasoja; Leena Lyydia Pohjala; Päivi Sirpa Marjaana Tammela; Panu Juhani Somervuo; Pia Maarit Vuorela; Teemu Heikki Teeri
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Phenolic compounds in ectomycorrhizal interaction of lignin modified silver birch.

Authors:  Suvi Sutela; Karoliina Niemi; Jaanika Edesi; Tapio Laakso; Pekka Saranpää; Jaana Vuosku; Riina Mäkelä; Heidi Tiimonen; Vincent L Chiang; Janne Koskimäki; Marja Suorsa; Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto; Hely Häggman
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.