| Literature DB >> 19788757 |
Suvi Sutela1, Karoliina Niemi, Jaanika Edesi, Tapio Laakso, Pekka Saranpää, Jaana Vuosku, Riina Mäkelä, Heidi Tiimonen, Vincent L Chiang, Janne Koskimäki, Marja Suorsa, Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto, Hely Häggman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The monolignol biosynthetic pathway interconnects with the biosynthesis of other secondary phenolic metabolites, such as cinnamic acid derivatives, flavonoids and condensed tannins. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether genetic modification of the monolignol pathway in silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) would alter the metabolism of these phenolic compounds and how such alterations, if exist, would affect the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19788757 PMCID: PMC2763875 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1RT-PCR results of . Relative expression of the endogenous putative caffeate/5-hydroxyferulate O-methyltransferase of silver birch (BpCOMT) (A) and the heterologous PtCOMT gene (B) normalized using atub and putative BpPP2A as reference genes in the non-inoculated and mycorrhizal roots of clone A and PtCOMT-modified lines 23, 44 and 65. Values are means ± standard error. Different letters above the columns denote significant (P < 0.05) difference between the PtCOMT lines and clone A within the treatments according to the two-sample t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test with the Bonferroni correction. Number of replicates 3-5.
Figure 2The lignin syringyl/quiaicyl ratios of non-inoculated and mycorrhizal silver birches. The lignin syringyl/quiaicyl (S/G) ratios of stems (A) and roots (B) of non-transgenic clone A and PtCOMT-modified lines 23, 44 and 65. Values are means ± standard deviation. Different letters above the columns denote significant (P < 0.05) differences between the non-inoculated and mycorrhizal plants within the line/clone and between lines/clone within the fungal treatment according to the Wilcoxon rank sum test with the Benjamini & Hochberg correction or the two-sample t-test with the Benjamini & Hochberg correction. Number of replicates 3.
Figure 3Histochemical localization of lignin in non-inoculated silver birches. Cross-sections of stem and root of non-inoculated clone A (A, E, I, M) and PtCOMT-modified lines 23 (B, F, J, N), 44 (C, G, K, O) and 65 (D, H, L, P). Stems (A-H) and roots (I-P). Lignin stained pink-red in the phloroglucinol-HCL stained sections (A-D, I-L). In the Mäule stainings (E-H, M-P), syringyl lignin pink-red and guaiacyl lignin light brown to dark brown. xf, xylem fibre; xr, xylem ray; xv, xylem vessel.
Concentrations of phenolic compounds and condensed tannins in non-inoculated and mycorrhizal silver birches
| Cinnamic acid derivatives | c | 2.48 ± 0.44 a | 2.12 ± 0.57 a | 2.21 ± 0.37 a | 2.30 ± 0.43 a |
| ECM | 2.84 ± 0.71 a | 2.35 ± 0.72 a | 2.35 ± 0.41 a | 2.50 ± 0.54 a | |
| Flavonoids | c | 26.14 ± 4.00 a | 30.67 ± 8.64 a | 28.85 ± 2.14 a | 30.87 ± 8.68 a |
| ECM | 27.07 ± 7.36 a | 25.38 ± 9.78 a | 25.80 ± 5.25 a | 29.71 ± 5.80 a | |
| Apigenin derivatives | c | 0.20 ± 0.12 a | 0.31 ± 0.10 a | 0.31 ± 0.09 a | 0.43 ± 0.25 a |
| ECM | 0.40 ± 0.21 a | 0.19 ± 0.11 a | 0.24 ± 0.07 a | 0.39 ± 0.12 a | |
| Kaempherol derivatives | c | 0.85 ± 0.13 a | 0.71 ± 0.23 a | 0.90 ± 0.19 a | 0.68 ± 0.20 a |
| ECM | 0.83 ± 0.14 a | 0.73 ± 0.22 a | 0.97 ± 0.13 a | 0.69 ± 0.06 a | |
| Myricetin derivatives | c | 18.31 ± 3.58 a | 22.81 ± 6.34 a | 21.77 ± 1.75 a | 21.66 ± 6.11 a |
| ECM | 18.83 ± 5.04 a | 18.40 ± 8.20 a | 17.90 ± 4.30 a | 20.17 ± 4.54 a | |
| Quercetin derivatives | c | 5.19 ± 1.34 a | 6.34 ± 2.12 a | 5.43 ± 1.45 a | 7.05 ± 1.64 a |
| ECM | 6.38 ± 1.52 a | 5.52 ± 1.98 a | 5.84 ± 1.18 a | 7.20 ± 1.19 a | |
| Condensed tannins | c | 160.41 ± 24.97 a | 142.87 ± 47.63 a | 127.54 ± 34.23 a | 154.82 ± 28.44 a |
| ECM | 142.40 ± 68.98 a | 106.7 ± 22.57 a | 149.21 ± 24.76 a | 142.32 ± 62.23 a | |
| c | 3.21 ± 0.47 a | 1.84 ± 0.49 b | 2.46 ± 0,32 ab | 2.71 ± 0.61 ab | |
| ECM | 3.10 ± 0.36 ac | 2.22 ± 0.71 bc | 2.42 ± 0.32 ac | 2.42 ± 0.38 ab | |
| Cinnamic acid derivatives | c | 2.68 ± 0.68 a | 1.37 ± 0.28 b | 1.33 ± 0.25 b | 1.65 ± 0.37 bc |
| ECM | 2.33 ± 0.33 ac | 1.46 ± 0.18 b | 1.27 ± 0.30 b | 1.18 ± 0.20 b | |
| Flavonoids | c | 14.33 ± 1.74 ab | 11.43 ± 1.49 ab | 10.23 ± 1.43 b | 13.79 ± 2.81 ab |
| ECM | 14.60 ± 2.12 a | 12.38 ± 1.89 ab | 10.77 ± 2.37 ab | 11.18 ± 1.47 ab | |
| Phenolic glycosides | c | 16.86 ± 1.46 ab | 19.48 ± 0.81 ab | 18.18 ± 2.22 ab | 22.67 ± 5.31 b |
| ECM | 15.40 ± 2.74 a | 20.61 ± 2.29 ab | 20.61 ± 2.29 ab | 17.37 ± 5.29 ab | |
| Condensed tannins | c | 108.57 ± 50.76 a | 138.57 ± 13.52 a | 137.43 ± 13.72 a | 141.47 ± 16.70 a |
| ECM | 144.82 ± 19.68 a | 132.86 ± 11.23 a | 131.90 ± 9.26 a | 130.32 ± 12.55 a | |
| Cinnamic acid derivatives | c | 0.71 ± 0.33 a | 0.17 ± 00.05 a | 0.17 ± 0.10 a | 0.37 ± 0.23 a |
| ECM | 0.53 ± 0.30 a | 0.19 ± 0.02 a | 0.20 ± 0.13 a | 0.24 ± 0.14 a | |
| Flavonoids | c | 11.39 ± 0.62 a | 9.45 ± 1.83 a | 8.41 ± 1.93 a | 8.26 ± 2.26 a |
| ECM | 11.24 ± 2.78 a | 12.10 ± 2.55 a | 7.88 ± 2.91 a | 7.21 ± 1.25 a | |
| Gallo/Ellagitannins | c | 0.06 ± 0.01 a | 0.32 ± 0.24 a | 0.28 ± 0.09 a | 0.12 ± 0.06 a |
| ECM | 0.11 ± 0.06 a | 0.36 ± 0.08 a | 0.23 ± 0.12 a | 0.15 ± 0.13 a | |
| Condensed tannins | c | 130.50 ± 22.43 a | 113.87 ± 17.86 a | 106.92 ± 27.75 a | 112.24 ± 8.94 a |
| ECM | 126.09 ± 6.80 a | 116.24 ± 10.11 a | 108.47 ± 5.62 a | 100.46 ± 2.24 a | |
| Condensed tannin precursors | c | 35.07 ± 5.81 ab | 31.44 ± 7.15 ab | 28.60 ± 5.50 ab | 28.50 ± 3.81 ab |
| ECM | 37.20 ± 9.43 ac | 41.92 ± 10.62 a | 20.38 ± 6.70 b | 25.44 ± 2.21 bc | |
Concentrations (mg/DW g) of phenolic compounds and condensed tannins in the leaf, stem and root samples of silver birch clone A and PtCOMT-modified lines 23, 44 and 65 after 8 weeks in co-culture with P. involutus. Values are means ± standard deviations in the presence (ECM) or absence (c) of the fungus. Different letters following the values denote significant differences (P < 0.05) between the non-inoculated and mycorrhizal plants within the line/clone and between lines/clone within the fungal treatment according to the Kruskal-Wallis test combined with the Wilcoxon rank sum test with the Benjamini & Hochberg correction or the one-way or two-way Anova combined with Tukey's honestly significant difference test or with the two-sample t-test with the Benjamini & Hochberg correction. For statistical testing the leaf apigenin derivatives were square root, stem cinnamic acid derivatives log 10 and root condensed tannins square transformed. Number of replicates 4-7.
Survival and ECM characteristics of silver birches
| A | 74 | 76 | 31 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 23 | 92 | 95 | 83 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 44 | 95 | 100 | 74 | 14 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| 65 | 92 | 87 | 58 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Survival percentages of non-inoculated and inoculated silver birches of clone A and PtCOMT-modified lines 23, 44 and 65, percentages of the ECM plants of all inoculated plants (ECM %) and number of ECM root tips in root systems classified to five categories: I = 1-20 ECMs, II = 20-30 ECMs, III = 30-50 ECMs, IV = 50-100 ECMs, V ≥ 100 ECMs.
Figure 4ECM roots of silver birch. Cross-sections (5-10 μm) of silver birch clone A (A) and PtCOMT lines 23 (B), 44 (C) and 65 (D) roots after 8 weeks of co-cultivation with P. involutus. Arrow, Hartig net; triangle, mycelium of P. involutus; e, epidermal cell of silver birch root. Bars = 20 μm.
Growth characteristics of non-inoculated and mycorrhizal silver birches
| A | c | 0.08 ± 0.04 a | 1.75 ± 0.76 a | 25.79 ± 19.90 a | 0.80 ± 0.25 a | 4.00 ± 1.33 a | 16.70 ± 2.83 a |
| ECM | 0.07 ± 0.02 a | 2.03 ± 0.76 a | 34.49 ± 17.44 a | 0.97 ± 0.24 b | 4.00 ± 1.31 a | 17.14 ± 1.04 a | |
| 23 | c | 0.15 ± 0.08 a | 2.76 ± 0.88 a | 23.75 ± 16.23 a | 1.39 ± 0.40 a | 4.97 ± 1.49 a | 17.55 ± 3.78 a |
| ECM | 0.16 ± 0.09 a | 3.06 ± 0.86 b | 23.06 ± 13.63 a | 1.59 ± 0.48 b | 5.50 ± 1.72 a | 17.59 ± 3.35 a | |
| 44 | c | 0.14 ± 0.06 a | 2.70 ± 0.37 a | 22.93 ± 9.28 a | 1.40 ± 0.26 a | 5.15 ± 1.54 a | 18.64 ± 2.00 a |
| ECM | 0.15 ± 0.08 a | 2.89 ± 0.51 b | 23.28 ± 12.30 a | 1.43 ± 0.29 a | 7.68 ± 3.16 a | 19.07 ± 2.10 a | |
| 65 | c | 0.17 ± 0.08 a | 2.59 ± 0.43 a | 17.70 ± 7.03 a | 1.19 ± 0.20 a | 4.03 ± 0.85 a | 19.52 ± 2.05 a |
| ECM | 0.18 ± 0.09 a | 2.83 ± 0.47 b | 20.73 ± 11.90 b | 1.26 ± 0.31 a | 4.53 ± 1.22 a | 18.52 ± 1.85 a |
Effects of the mycorrhiza formation on the growth of silver birch control clone A and PtCOMT-modified lines 23, 44 and 65 after 8 weeks in co-culture with P. involutus in a greenhouse. Initial fresh weights (FWs) and final FWs of plants, root/shoot ratios, number and length of adventitious roots. Values are means ± standard deviations in the presence (ECM) or absence (c) of the fungus. Different letters following the values denote a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the non-inoculated and inoculated plants with mycorrhizas within each line/clone according to the Wilcoxon rank sum test or the two-sample t-test. Number of replicates 9-35.