Literature DB >> 12694847

Patient setup error measurement using 3D intensity-based image registration techniques.

Sébastien Clippe1, David Sarrut, Claude Malet, Serge Miguet, Chantal Ginestet, Christian Carrie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conformal radiotherapy requires accurate patient positioning with reference to the initial three-dimensional (3D) CT image. Patient setup is controlled by comparison with portal images acquired immediately before patient treatment. Several automatic methods have been proposed, generally based on segmentation procedures. However, portal images are of very low contrast, leading to segmentation inaccuracies. In this study, we propose an intensity-based (with no segmentation), fully automatic, 3D method, associating two portal images and a 3D CT scan to estimate patient setup.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of an anthropomorphic phantom were used. A CT scan of the pelvic area was first acquired, then the phantom was installed in seven positions. The process is a 3D optimization of a similarity measure in the space of rigid transformations. To avoid time-consuming digitally reconstructed radiograph generation at each iteration, we used two-dimensional transformations and two sets of specific and pregenerated digitally reconstructed radiographs. We also propose a technique for computing intensity-based similarity measures between several couples of images. A correlation coefficient, chi-square, mutual information, and correlation ratio were used.
RESULTS: The best results were obtained with the correlation ratio. The median root mean square error was 2.0 mm for the seven positions tested and was, respectively, 3.6, 4.4, and 5.1 for correlation coefficient, chi-square, and mutual information.
CONCLUSIONS: Full 3D analysis of setup errors is feasible without any segmentation step. It is fast and accurate and could therefore be used before each treatment session. The method presents three main advantages for clinical implementation-it is fully automatic, applicable to all tumor sites, and requires no additional device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12694847     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00083-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  Effect of daily setup errors on individual dose distribution in conventional radiotherapy: an initial study.

Authors:  Akihiro Takemura; Saori Shoji; Sinichi Ueda; Yuichi Kurata; Tomoyasu Kumano; Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Masayuki Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

2.  Automated 2D-3D registration of a radiograph and a cone beam CT using line-segment enhancement.

Authors:  Reshma Munbodh; David A Jaffray; Douglas J Moseley; Zhe Chen; Jonathan P S Knisely; Pascal Cathier; James S Duncan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A frequency-based approach to locate common structure for 2D-3D intensity-based registration of setup images in prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Reshma Munbodh; Zhe Chen; David A Jaffray; Douglas J Moseley; Jonathan P S Knisely; James S Duncan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Automated 2D-3D registration of portal images and CT data using line-segment enhancement.

Authors:  Reshma Munbodh; Zhe Chen; David A Jaffray; Douglas J Moseley; Jonathan P S Knisely; James S Duncan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Vesselness-based 2D-3D registration of the coronary arteries.

Authors:  Daniel Ruijters; Bart M ter Haar Romeny; Paul Suetens
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  DRR and portal image registration for automatic patient positioning in radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Ma Consuelo Bastida-Jumilla; Jorge Larrey-Ruiz; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Juan Morales-Sánchez; José-Luis Sancho-Gómez
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Fast reconstructed radiographs from octree-compressed volumetric data.

Authors:  Mark Fisher; Osama Dorgham; Stephen D Laycock
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  A versatile intensity-based 3D/2D rigid registration compatible with mobile C-arm for endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  A Duménil; A Kaladji; M Castro; C Göksu; A Lucas; P Haigron
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  A gradient feature weighted Minimax algorithm for registration of multiple portal images to 3DCT volumes in prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sudhakar Chelikani; Kailasnath Purushothaman; Jonathan Knisely; Zhe Chen; Ravinder Nath; Ravi Bansal; James Duncan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Nonrigid image registration for head and neck cancer radiotherapy treatment planning with PET/CT.

Authors:  Rob H Ireland; Karen E Dyker; David C Barber; Steven M Wood; Michael B Hanney; Wendy B Tindale; Neil Woodhouse; Nigel Hoggard; John Conway; Martin H Robinson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.