Literature DB >> 20024650

Apparent motion during saccadic suppression periods.

Robert Scott Allison1, Jens Schumacher, Shabnam Sadr, Rainer Herpers.   

Abstract

Sensitivity to many visual stimuli, and, in particular, image displacement, is reduced during a change in fixation (saccade) compared to when the eye is still. In these experiments, we studied the sensitivity of observers to ecologically relevant image translations of large, complex, real world scenes either during horizontal saccades or during fixation. In the first experiment, we found that such displacements were much less detectable during saccades than during fixation. Qualitatively, even when trans-saccadic scene changes were detectable, they were less salient and appeared slower than equivalent changes in the absence of a saccade. Two further experiments followed up on this observation and estimated the perceived magnitude of trans-saccadic apparent motion using a two-interval forced-choice procedure (Experiment 2) and a magnitude estimation procedure (Experiment 3). Both experiments suggest that trans-saccadic displacements were perceived as smaller than equivalent inter-saccadic displacements. We conclude that during saccades, the magnitude of the apparent motion signal is attenuated as well as its detectability.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024650     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2120-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Yes-no staircases with fixed step sizes: psychometric properties and optimal setup.

Authors:  M A García-Pérez
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Suppression of displacement in severely slowed saccades.

Authors:  M R MacAskill; T J Anderson; R D Jones
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Bridgeman; D Hendry; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Different effects of eyelid blinks and target blanking on saccadic suppression of displacement.

Authors:  Heiner Deubel; Bruce Bridgeman; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-07

5.  Effect of saccadic adaptation on localization of visual targets.

Authors:  Holger Awater; David Burr; Markus Lappe; M Concetta Morrone; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Immediate post-saccadic information mediates space constancy.

Authors:  H Deubel; B Bridgeman; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Saccadic suppression of displacement: separate influences of saccade size and of target retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  W Li; L Matin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  What you see is what you need.

Authors:  Jochen Triesch; Dana H Ballard; Mary M Hayhoe; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Motion perception during saccades.

Authors:  U J Ilg; K P Hoffmann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Perception of images moving at saccadic velocities during saccades and during fixation.

Authors:  B A Brooks; J T Yates; R D Coleman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  3 in total

1.  Spatial position information accumulates steadily over time.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; M Concetta Morrone; David C Burr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Spatiotopic coding and remapping in humans.

Authors:  David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.