RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors present advances in electrocardiographically (ECG) gated cardiac spiral scanning with recently introduced 16-section computed tomographic (CT) equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors discuss the technical principles of ECG-gated cardiac scanning. They give an overview on system properties and on the detector design. They describe ECG-gated scan- and image-reconstruction techniques and ECG-controlled dose modulation ("ECG pulsing") for a reduction of the patient dose. They discuss key parameters for image quality and present simulation and phantom studies and they give preliminary values for the patient dose. RESULTS: An extension of the adaptive cardiac volume reconstruction for ECG-gated spiral CT provides adequate image quality for up to 16 sections. With the smallest reconstructed section width (about 0.83 mm) and overlapping image reconstruction, cylindrical holes 0.6-0.7 mm in diameter can be resolved in a transverse resolution phantom independent of the heart rate. For coronary CT angiography, the influence of transverse resolution is most pronounced for coronary segments that are only slightly tilted relative to the scan plane. In this case, visualization of stents and plaques is considerably improved with 1.0-mm or smaller section width. For 0.42-second gantry rotation time, temporal resolution reaches its optimum (105 msec) at a heart rate of 81 beats per minute. Effective patient dose for the standard protocols recommended by the manufacturer ranges from 0.45 mSv (male) for ECG-triggered calcium scoring to 7.1 mSv (male) for high-resolution ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. With ECG pulsing, the dose is reduced by 30%-50% depending on the patient's heart rate. CONCLUSION: Clinical experience will be needed to evaluate fully the potential of 16-section technology for cardiac imaging.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors present advances in electrocardiographically (ECG) gated cardiac spiral scanning with recently introduced 16-section computed tomographic (CT) equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors discuss the technical principles of ECG-gated cardiac scanning. They give an overview on system properties and on the detector design. They describe ECG-gated scan- and image-reconstruction techniques and ECG-controlled dose modulation ("ECG pulsing") for a reduction of the patient dose. They discuss key parameters for image quality and present simulation and phantom studies and they give preliminary values for the patient dose. RESULTS: An extension of the adaptive cardiac volume reconstruction for ECG-gated spiral CT provides adequate image quality for up to 16 sections. With the smallest reconstructed section width (about 0.83 mm) and overlapping image reconstruction, cylindrical holes 0.6-0.7 mm in diameter can be resolved in a transverse resolution phantom independent of the heart rate. For coronary CT angiography, the influence of transverse resolution is most pronounced for coronary segments that are only slightly tilted relative to the scan plane. In this case, visualization of stents and plaques is considerably improved with 1.0-mm or smaller section width. For 0.42-second gantry rotation time, temporal resolution reaches its optimum (105 msec) at a heart rate of 81 beats per minute. Effective patient dose for the standard protocols recommended by the manufacturer ranges from 0.45 mSv (male) for ECG-triggered calcium scoring to 7.1 mSv (male) for high-resolution ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. With ECG pulsing, the dose is reduced by 30%-50% depending on the patient's heart rate. CONCLUSION: Clinical experience will be needed to evaluate fully the potential of 16-section technology for cardiac imaging.
Authors: Ryo Nakazato; Haim Shmilovich; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Victor Y Cheng; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Damini Dey Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2011-03-21
Authors: Christopher Herzog; Selami Dogan; Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker; Joern O Balzer; Martin G Mack; Thomas J Vogl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Henk A Marquering; Jouke Dijkstra; Patrick J H de Koning; Berend C Stoel; Johan H C Reiber Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Ambarish Gopal; Song S Mao; Daniel Karlsberg; Emily Young; Joshua Waggoner; Naser Ahmadi; Raveen S Pal; John Leal; Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 2.357