Literature DB >> 19350247

Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of left ventricular function and mass in patients with mitral regurgitation: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Ying-kun Guo1, Zhi-gang Yang, Gang Ning, Li Rao, Li Dong, Ying Pen, Tai-ming Zhang, Yang Wu, Xiao-chun Zhang, Qi-ling Wang.   

Abstract

Quantitative values of left ventricular (LV) function and muscle mass in patients with mitral regurgitation are independent predictors of cardiac morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether 64-MDCT can assess the LV function in patients with mitral regurgitation with high accuracy when compared with the MRI and echocardiography results. Fifty-one patients with mitral regurgitation underwent retrospectively ECG-gated 64-MDCT, echocardiography, and MRI for assessing the global ventricular function. End-diastolic and end-systolic volume, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and mass were measured on 64-MDCT and echocardiography, and compared with the results measured on MRI which served as the reference standard. Intertechnique agreement was tested by using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. No significant differences were revealed in calculated LV function and mass between the 64-MDCT and MRI (paired t test, p = 0.07-0.53). Pearson's correlation analysis showed the functional parameters and mass correlated closely between the 64-MDCT and MRI (r = 0.89-0.96, p < 0.001). When compared with MRI, echocardiography underestimated the volumetric parameters of LV (paired t test, p = 0.0003-0.004), but significantly overestimated the EF values (p = 0.003), and moderate correlations of functional parameters were obtained (r = 0.78, 0.60, 0.81, and 0.62, respectively). ECG-gated 64-MDCT allows for accurate and reliable assessment of LV function in patients with mitral regurgitation, whereas LV volumes measured by two-dimensional echocardiography were underestimated and the ejection fraction was overestimated when compared with those achieved by using MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350247     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1392-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  24 in total

1.  Prevalence and correlates of mitral regurgitation in a population-based sample (the Strong Heart Study).

Authors:  E C Jones; R B Devereux; M J Roman; J E Liu; D Fishman; E T Lee; T K Welty; R R Fabsitz; B V Howard
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Subha V Raman; Mona Shah; Beth McCarthy; Anne Garcia; Amy K Ferketich
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with 16-slice multi-slice computed tomography; comparison with 2D-echocardiography.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; J J Bax; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; L P Salm; A de Roos; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Additional predictive value of both left and right ventricular ejection fractions on long-term survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Y Juillière; G Barbier; L Feldmann; A Grentzinger; N Danchin; F Cherrier
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: A quantitative clinical study.

Authors:  S F Yiu; M Enriquez-Sarano; C Tribouilloy; J B Seward; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Validation of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for quantifying left ventricular volumes in the presence of a left ventricular aneurysm: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  J X Qin; M Jones; T Shiota; N L Greenberg; H Tsujino; M S Firstenberg; P C Gupta; A D Zetts; Y Xu; J Ping Sun; L A Cardon; J A Odabashian; S D Flamm; R D White; J A Panza; J D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging.

Authors:  Masaki Yamamuro; Eiji Tadamura; Shigeto Kubo; Hiroshi Toyoda; Takeshi Nishina; Muneo Ohba; Ryohei Hosokawa; Takeshi Kimura; Nagara Tamaki; Masashi Komeda; Toru Kita; Junji Konishi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Dynamic cine imaging of the mitral valve with 16-MDCT: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Hatem Alkadhi; Dominique Bettex; Simon Wildermuth; Bernhard Baumert; Andre Plass; Jurg Grunenfelder; Lotus Desbiolles; Borut Marincek; Thomas Boehm
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Age- and gender-specific differences in left and right ventricular cardiac function and mass determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Sandstede; C Lipke; M Beer; S Hofmann; T Pabst; W Kenn; S Neubauer; D Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

1.  Relationship between left ventricular mass and coronary artery disease in young adults: a single-center study using cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Jae Yong Cho; Joo Sung Sun; Young Keun Sur; Jin Sun Park; Doo Kyoung Kang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Relation of left ventricular mass and concentric remodeling to extent of coronary artery disease by computed tomography in patients without left ventricular hypertrophy: ROMICAT study.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Michael Toepker; Amir A Mahabadi; Fabian Bamberg; Ian S Rogers; Ron Blankstein; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Computed Tomography for Structural Heart Disease and Interventions.

Authors:  Pascal Thériault-Lauzier; Marco Spaziano; Beatriz Vaquerizo; Jean Buithieu; Giuseppe Martucci; Nicolo Piazza
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Coronary CT and the coronary calcium score, the future of ED risk stratification?

Authors:  Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Ana Garcia-Alvarez; Gabriela Guzman; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

Review 5.  Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim; Hwan Seok Yong; Sung Mok Kim; Jeong A Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Yoo Jin Hong
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.