Literature DB >> 19779688

[The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Robert Kipping1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis with minimal trauma to the soft tissue. The need for visual aids (e.g., navigation or X-rays) during the procedure is frequently avoided. INDICATIONS: All kinds of coxarthrosis for every age group, for every variation of bone construction, and even in obese patients. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Extremely dysplastic hip joints involving the development of a secondary socket and the necessity of reconstruction of the acetabular socket (e.g., in the Harris method). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Using a fixed lateral position, a small entry incision is made between the tensor fasciae latae and the sartorius muscles and the prosthesis socket is put into place. Via a second dorsal incision, after stripping the exterior rotators, the prosthesis stem and ball are implanted and the two parts of the prosthesis are attached. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Full weight bearing allowed immediately. A luxation prophylaxis, in the form of a self-developed hip bodice (the so-called Yale bandage), is used until the end of the 4th postoperative week. Discharge from hospital is possible after just a few days. Upon discharge, the patient is sent to a rehabilitation facility, either as a resident or as an outpatient, for approximately 3 weeks. Return to the workplace, with only light physical activity, is possible once the wound has healed completely; this could be as soon as 14 days after the operation. Checkups are made after 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and then every year; these checkups include a full examination, X-rays and laboratory tests. Full exposure to sport or heavy manual labor is usually approved after the 6-month checkup.
RESULTS: Between October 2004 and April 2006, a total of 221 patients underwent surgery using this new technique (of these 15 patients underwent two-stage bilateral hip joint replacements). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 30 months. The Harris Hip Score improved from an average of 45.25 preoperatively to 96.4 postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779688     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-009-1809-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  49 in total

1.  Gluteus medius tendon injury during reaming for gamma nail insertion.

Authors:  Timothy McConnell; Paul Tornetta; Emily Benson; Jennifer Manuel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reliability of the safe area for the superior gluteal nerve.

Authors:  Fatih Eksioglu; Murad Uslu; Eftal Gudemez; O Sahap Atik; Ibrahim Tekdemir
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [A posterior mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty -- results of 76 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Rittmeister; A Peters
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

4.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques.

Authors:  Rodrigo Mardones; Mark W Pagnano; Joseph P Nemanich; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.

Authors:  Anthony M DiGioia; Anton Y Plakseychuk; Timothy J Levison; Branislav Jaramaz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The transgluteal approach to the hip joint.

Authors:  R Bauer; F Kerschbaumer; S Poisel; W Oberthaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1979-10

7.  Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T R Light; K J Keggi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. Surgical technique.

Authors:  B Sonny Bal; Doug Haltom; Thomas Aleto; Matthew Barrett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience.

Authors:  Thomas P Sculco; Louis C Jordan; William L Walter
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision.

Authors:  Fujio Higuchi; Masafumi Gotoh; Noboru Yamaguchi; Ritsu Suzuki; Yoshifumi Kunou; Kazuo Ooishi; Kensei Nagata
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Current knowledge on minimally invasive hip replacement].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Nerve lesions after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; F Heinen; D E Holzapfel; K Reiners; U Nöth; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.