Literature DB >> 20516229

Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.

Lynn Huestegge1, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

Response-related mechanisms of multitasking were studied by analyzing simultaneous processing of responses in different modalities (i.e., crossmodal action). Participants responded to a single auditory stimulus with a saccade, a manual response (single-task conditions), or both (dual-task condition). We used a spatially incompatible stimulus-response mapping for one task, but not for the other. Critically, inverting these mappings varied temporal task overlap in dual-task conditions while keeping spatial incompatibility across responses constant. Unlike previous paradigms, temporal task overlap was manipulated without utilizing sequential stimulus presentation, which might induce strategic serial processing. The results revealed dual-task costs, but these were not affected by an increase of temporal task overlap. This finding is evidence for parallel response selection in multitasking. We propose that crossmodal action is processed by a central mapping-selection mechanism in working memory and that the dual-task costs are mainly caused by mapping-related crosstalk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20516229     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.4.493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  29 in total

Review 1.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; James C Johnston; Mark Van Selst; Shelly Whitsell; Roger Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.

Authors:  C Fagot; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-20

6.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Eric Ruthruff; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects.

Authors:  Rolf Ulrich; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions.

Authors:  H Bekkering; J J Adam; H Kingma; A Huson; H T Whiting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Kieras
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  15 in total

1.  Action effects in saccade control.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Magali Kreutzfeldt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Searching working memory for the source of dual-task costs.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Timothy Wifall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

3.  Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness.

Authors:  Christine Stelzel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-03

4.  Talking and driving: applications of crossmodal action reveal a special role for spatial language.

Authors:  Paul Atchley; Jeff Dressel; Todd C Jones; Rebecca A Burson; David Marshall
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-28

Review 5.  The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-01

6.  Crossmodal action: modality matters.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11

7.  Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs.

Authors:  Aleks Pieczykolan; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-27

8.  Oculomotor interference during manual response preparation: evidence from the response-cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Jos J Adam
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control.

Authors:  Jens Kürten; Tim Raettig; Julian Gutzeit; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-04-08

10.  Response-code conflict in dual-task interference and its modulation by age.

Authors:  Lya K Paas Oliveros; Aleks Pieczykolan; Rachel N Pläschke; Simon B Eickhoff; Robert Langner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.