Literature DB >> 15827737

Central processing overlap modulates P3 latency.

R Dell'acqua1, P Jolicoeur, F Vespignani, P Toffanin.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the issue of the functional mechanisms exerting a modulatory effect on the latency of the P3. In experiment 1, using a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, two sequential stimuli (T(1) and T(2)) were presented in each trial at varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), each requiring a speeded choice response. Substantial lengthening of the reaction time to T(2) was observed as SOA decreased (i.e., PRP effect). A systematic investigation of the T(2)-locked P3 component amplitude and latency was undertaken to discover whether either of these P3 parameters was correlated with the PRP effect. The results showed lengthening of the T(2)-locked P3 component latency as SOA was decreased, and, across subjects, a positive correlation between the PRP effect and P3 latency lengthening. No SOA-dependent P3 amplitude variation was observed. In experiment 2, the P3 component was measured under single-task conditions. P3 amplitude was higher under single-task than under dual-task conditions, but no SOA-dependent latency variations were observed in this experiment. Overall, the results of both experiments support the notion that part of the processing reflected in P3 activity occurs at or after the locus of the PRP effect, thus suggesting strongly that central mechanisms are involved in P3 latency variations.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827737     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2281-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination.

Authors:  W Sommer; H Leuthold; T Schubert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Dissociating sources of dual-task interference using human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Alicia M Helion; Jessica A Hurdelbrink; Brian Pasieka
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

4.  Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b.

Authors:  J Katayama; J Polich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  P3 waves to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequences.

Authors:  E Courchesne; S A Hillyard; R Y Courchesne
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Event-related potentials elicited by automatic targets: a dual-task analysis.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; M R Houck; F W MacMillan; R F Simons; L C Oatman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A triarchic model of P300 amplitude.

Authors:  R Johnson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Second thoughts: multiple P300s elicited by a single stimulus.

Authors:  R Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Kieras
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  10 in total

1.  Psychopathy is associated with an exaggerated attention bottleneck: EEG and behavioral evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Scott Tillem; Hannah Weinstein; Arielle Baskin-Sommers
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Wendy L Olsen; Daniel Kleinman; Stefan A Frisch; Victor S Ferreira; Jennifer J Lister
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Common and distinct neural correlates of dual-tasking and task-switching: a meta-analytic review and a neuro-cognitive processing model of human multitasking.

Authors:  Britta Worringer; Robert Langner; Iring Koch; Simon B Eickhoff; Claudia R Eickhoff; Ferdinand C Binkofski
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  The brain's router: a cortical network model of serial processing in the primate brain.

Authors:  Ariel Zylberberg; Diego Fernández Slezak; Pieter R Roelfsema; Stanislas Dehaene; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  What Phonological Facilitation Tells about Semantic Interference: A Dual-Task Study.

Authors:  Pauline Ayora; Francesca Peressotti; F-Xavier Alario; Claudio Mulatti; Patrick Pluchino; Remo Job; Roberto Dell'acqua
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-06

6.  ERP Evidence for Ultra-Fast Semantic Processing in the Picture-Word Interference Paradigm.

Authors:  Roberto Dell'acqua; Paola Sessa; Francesca Peressotti; Claudio Mulatti; Eduardo Navarrete; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-27

7.  Time-Resolved Decoding of Two Processing Chains during Dual-Task Interference.

Authors:  Sébastien Marti; Jean-Rémi King; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Delays without mistakes: response time and error distributions in dual-task.

Authors:  Juan Esteban Kamienkowski; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.

Authors:  Xing-Qi Yao; Yu-Qian Yang; Shi-Yong Chen; Wei Sun; Qi Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Attentional modulation of orthographic neighborhood effects during reading: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in a psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; Markus Conrad; Carlos J Álvarez; Jörg Paschke-Goldt; Werner Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.