Literature DB >> 12668743

Nationwide trends in rates of utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging among the Medicare population between 1993 and 1999.

Andrea J Maitino1, David C Levin, Laurence Parker, Vijay M Rao, Jonathan H Sunshine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine current utilization rates and recent nationwide trends for noninvasive diagnostic imaging (NDI) among the Medicare population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medicare Part B claims data files from 1993, 1996, and 1999 were analyzed for all procedure codes related to NDI. NDI codes were grouped into 22 imaging categories, as well as seven imaging modality groups. The data were analyzed to determine the overall nationwide utilization and relative value unit (RVU) volume and rates and changes in utilization rates and RVU rates between 1993 and 1999 for the Medicare fee-for-service population, which included approximately 33 million enrollees per year.
RESULTS: The overall utilization rate for all NDI in 1999 was 324,974 examinations per 100,000 enrollees. Conventional radiography was the most utilized imaging technology (55.5%), followed by ultrasonography (US) (20.5%), computed tomography (CT) (8.8%), mammography (6.0%), nuclear imaging (5.2%), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (2.6%), and bone densitometry (1.5%) (percentages do not add up to 100% due to rounding). In the 6-year interval from 1993 to 1999, the rate of NDI utilization increased 3.8%. The utilization rate for conventional radiography decreased 13.7%, while that of all other modalities increased a combined total of 39.1%. During this 6-year period, RVU rates per 100,000 increased 14.6%, with RVUs for MR imaging increasing 76.6%; those for nuclear imaging, 38.7%; those for CT, 28.3%; and those for US, 24.2%.
CONCLUSION: A 3.8% increase in the rate of NDI utilization occurred during the 6-year period between 1993 and 1999. A considerably larger increase in RVU rates (14.6%) occurred during the same time period.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12668743     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2272020617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

1.  Utilization rates of neuroradiology across neuroscience specialties in the private office setting: who owns or leases the scanners on which studies are performed?

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem; L Parker; D C Levin; V Rao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Leonard MacWilliam; Lisa Lix; Patricia Caetano; Gregory S Finlayson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Twenty years of cost-effectiveness analysis in medical imaging: are we improving?

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Frank J Rybicki; Dan Greenberg; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluation of adverse reactions to contrast media in the hospital.

Authors:  E-J Kyung; J-H Ryu; E-Y Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Is more imaging better than less?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Leppo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The prevalence of positive imaging findings on MRI scans ordered by chiropractic versus medical providers.

Authors:  Larry Morries; Terry Yochum; Michael Barry; John Slizeski; Donald Freuden; Clark Danielson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2006

7.  The evolving role of radiologists within the health care system.

Authors:  Paul Martin Knechtges; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  An algorithm for intelligent sorting of CT-related dose parameters.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Stefan L Zimmerman; Scott R Steingall; William W Boonn; Woojin Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  An interactive RADIANCE toolkit for customizable CT dose monitoring and reporting.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Anand Sundaram; William W Boonn; Woojin Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Intestinal obstruction: trends in imaging utilization and their influence in its rising hospital bill.

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Sukru M Erturk; Roberto E Ochoa; Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Frank J Rybicki; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.