Literature DB >> 18427845

Intestinal obstruction: trends in imaging utilization and their influence in its rising hospital bill.

Hansel J Otero1, Sukru M Erturk, Roberto E Ochoa, Silvia Ondategui-Parra, Frank J Rybicki, Pablo R Ros.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate trends in the utilization of different imaging modalities and review how imaging utilization practices affect hospital charges for patients with intestinal obstruction. All patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of intestinal obstruction during 6 fiscal years (1999-2004) were retrospectively studied. We obtained data on patients' demographics, procedures, outcomes, imaging services utilization, and hospital and imaging charges from our institution's transition system (a clinical and financial decision support software system). The institutional review board approved this study. Surgery was performed in 26% of patients in 1999 and in 40% in 2004 (p = 0.01) with the mortality rate significantly (p < 0.01) dropping from 3.8% to 0.4%. A total of 5,292 abdominal imaging studies were obtained; 93% of those were either abdominal radiographs or abdomino-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans. CT studies per patient increased from 0.5 in 1999 to 1 in 2004 (p < 0.01), while abdominal radiographs (mean = 2.4) did not significantly change over the entire study period (p = 0.6). Average imaging charges doubled during the study period ($1,572 to $3,012, p < 0.01). Average hospital charges increased from $18,138 in 1999 to $32,808 in 2004 (p < 0.01). The fraction of hospital charges attributed to imaging varied between 8.7% and 9.2%. CT utilization for intestinal obstruction increased from 1999 to 2004 without modality substitution. While hospital and imaging charges have significantly increased, the fraction represented by imaging has remained constant, suggesting that imaging is an unlikely cause for the increase in hospital charges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427845     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-008-0726-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  34 in total

1.  Abdominal radiography findings in small-bowel obstruction: relevance to triage for additional diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  J C Lappas; B L Reyes; D D Maglinte
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  CT of small-bowel obstruction: another perspective using multiplanar reformations.

Authors:  E M Caoili; E K Paulson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Helical CT signs in the diagnosis of intestinal ischemia in small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  M Zalcman; M Sy; V Donckier; J Closset; D V Gansbeke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Current management of small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Awori J Hayanga; Kirsten Bass-Wilkins; Gregory B Bulkley
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2005

5.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria on small-bowel obstruction: a critique of the term and its terms.

Authors:  Stephen R Baker
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Outcomes research in radiology.

Authors:  B J Hillman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  George W. Holmes Lecture. CT of small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  E J Balthazar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Current management of small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  K N Bass; B Jones; G B Bulkley
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1997

9.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  S L Lee; A J Walsh; H S Ho
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-05

10.  Imaging utilization in the management of appendicitis and its impact on hospital charges.

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Sukru Mehmet Erturk; Roberto E Ochoa; Aldo Gonzalez-Beicos; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-10-31
View more
  1 in total

1.  Recommendations for additional imaging on emergency department CT examinations: comparison of emergency- and organ-based subspecialty radiologists.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Brent W Matza; Mark P Foran; John M McMenamy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-10-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.