Literature DB >> 12652177

Impact of automatic adjustment of stimulation outputs on pacemaker longevity in a new dual-chamber pacing system.

Christiane Brockes1, Mariette Rahn-Schönbeck, Firat Duru, Reto Candinas, Marko Turina.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Automatic capture verification using the Autocapture (AC) feature enabled by paced evoked response detection and delivery of high energy back-up pulses intends to increase patient safety. Furthermore, adjustment of stimulation outputs can save energy and potentially improve pacemaker (PM) longevity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the theoretical longevity of a new dual chamber PM with the integrated AC feature (Affinity DR, St. Jude Medical) in comparison to the longevity of a previous model from the same manufacturer without AC (Trilogy DR).
METHOD: Affinity PMs were implanted in 16 patients and connected to a compatible lead with low polarization properties. AC was activated when the evoked response was significantly higher than the polarization voltage. Theoretical PM longevity was calculated with and without AC during follow-up. The measured and calculated values were compared to measurements in 19 patients, who consecutively received Trilogy-PMs during the same time period.
RESULTS: In only one patient the evoked response was not adequate, and as a result, AC was not programmed. The calculated longevity of the Affinity-PMs 79 +/- 28 days after implantation was significantly higher in comparison to the Trilogy-PMs (Affinity-PMs: 8.9 +/- 1.2 years without and 9.5 +/- 1.1 years with AC; Trilogy-PMs: 6.5 +/- 0.8 years) (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: The AC feature is an optional algorithm that can be activated in most patients and it significantly prolongs predicted battery longevity due to automatic adjustment of stimulation outputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12652177     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022391931093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  12 in total

Review 1.  Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: clinical benefits and potential problems.

Authors:  F Duru; U Bauersfeld; H Schüller; R Candinas
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Adjustment of the evoked response sensitivity after hospital discharge in pacemaker patients with automatic ventricular threshold tracking activated.

Authors:  A Schuchert; R Ventura; T Meinertz
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 3.  [Cardiac pacemaker and internal defibrillators (ICD). Basic principles and new important developments, status 1998].

Authors:  I Deisenhofer; M Karch; B Zrenner; C Schmitt; A Schömig
Journal:  Fortschr Med       Date:  1998-08-20

4.  Pacing threshold spikes months and years after implant.

Authors:  R B Shepard; J Kim; E C Colvin; J Slabaugh; A E Epstein; L M Bargeron
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  [Diagnostic value of auto-capture: detection of lead dislocation].

Authors:  A Liebold; D E Birnbaum
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1997-07

6.  Italian experience with AutoCapture in conjunction with a membrane lead. Pacesetter Automatic Control of Energy and Membrane Automatic Threshold Evaluation (Pacemate) Study Group.

Authors:  S Sermasi; M Marconi; L Libero; P V Moracchini; L Rusconi; A Mininno; R Sigliano
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  The impact of automatic threshold tracking on pulse generator longevity in patients with different chronic stimulation thresholds.

Authors:  L Simeon; F Duru; M Fluri; H R Jenzer; M Rahn; R Candinas
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Automatic capture verification by charge-neutral sensing.

Authors:  V A Kadhiresan; A Olive; C Gornick; J Spinelli; D Villalta
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: a multicenter study. European Microny Study Group.

Authors:  M Clarke; B Liu; H Schüller; L Binner; C Kennergren; M Guerola; P Weinmann; O J Ohm
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 10.  Myocardial stimulation threshold in patients with cardiac pacemakers: effect of physiologic variables, pharmacologic agents, and lead electrodes.

Authors:  M L Dohrmann; N F Goldschlager
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.213

View more
  1 in total

1.  Manual vs. automatic capture management in implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.

Authors:  Francis D Murgatroyd; Erhard Helmling; Bernd Lemke; Bernd Eber; Christian Mewis; Judith van der Meer-Hensgens; Yanping Chang; Vladimir Khalameizer; Amos Katz
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 5.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.