Literature DB >> 11046190

Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: clinical benefits and potential problems.

F Duru1, U Bauersfeld, H Schüller, R Candinas.   

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of pacemaker stimulation thresholds and automatic adjustment of pacemaker outputs were among the longstanding goals of the pacing community. The first clinically successful implementation of threshold tracking pacing was the Autocapture feature which has accomplished automatic ventricular capture verification for every single stimulus by monitoring the Evoked Response (ER) signal resulting from myocardial depolarization. The Autocapture feature not only decreases energy consumption by keeping the stimulation output slightly above the actual threshold, but also increases patient safety by access to high-output back-up pulses if there is loss of capture. Furthermore, it provides valuable documentation of stimulation thresholds over time and serves as a valuable research tool. Current limitations for its widespread use include the requirements for implantation of bipolar low polarization leads and unipolar pacing in the ventricle. Fusion/pseudofusion beats with resultant insufficient or even non-existent ER signal amplitudes followed by unnecessary delivery of back-up pulses and a possible increase in pacemaker output is not an uncommon observation unique to the Autocapture feature. The recent incorporation of the Autocapture algorithm in dual chamber pacemakers has been challenging because of more frequent occurrence of fusion/pseudofusion beats in the presence of normal AV conduction. Along with a review of the previously published studies and our clinical experience, this article discusses the clinical advantages and potential problems of Autocapture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11046190     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009864615632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of the morphology of the unipolar endocardial paced evoked response.

Authors:  J Brouwer; D Nagelkerke; M J De Jongste; W Boute; P Den Heijer; K I Lie
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  New method of atrial and ventricular capture detection.

Authors:  B F Vonk; G Van Oort
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Italian experience with AutoCapture in conjunction with a membrane lead. Pacesetter Automatic Control of Energy and Membrane Automatic Threshold Evaluation (Pacemate) Study Group.

Authors:  S Sermasi; M Marconi; L Libero; P V Moracchini; L Rusconi; A Mininno; R Sigliano
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Low-energy epicardial pacing in children: the benefit of autocapture.

Authors:  U Bauersfeld; B Nowak; L Molinari; T Malm; C Kampmann; M H Schönbeck; H Schüller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  The automatic threshold tracking pacemaker.

Authors:  T A Preston; D L Bowers
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec

6.  Changes in myocardial threshold. Physiologic and pharmacologic factors in patients with implanted pacemakers.

Authors:  T A Preston; R D Fletcher; B R Lucchesi; R D Judge
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Alteration of pacemaker threshold by drug and physiological factors.

Authors:  T A Preston; R D Judge
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1969-10-30       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Influence of acute exposure to high altitude and hypoxemia on ventricular stimulation thresholds in pacemaker patients.

Authors:  D Weilenmann; F Duru; M Schönbeck; B Schenk; P Zwicky; E W Russi; R Candinas
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: a multicenter study. European Microny Study Group.

Authors:  M Clarke; B Liu; H Schüller; L Binner; C Kennergren; M Guerola; P Weinmann; O J Ohm
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 10.  Myocardial stimulation threshold in patients with cardiac pacemakers: effect of physiologic variables, pharmacologic agents, and lead electrodes.

Authors:  M L Dohrmann; N F Goldschlager
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.213

View more
  4 in total

1.  Uncommon Sense: What Does This Aberrant Pacing Spike Indicate?

Authors:  Daniel J Chu; Stephen Pickett; John Allison; Yochai Birnbaum
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Easy method to examine single nerve fiber excitability and conduction parameters using intact nonanesthetized earthworms.

Authors:  Robert Bähring; Christiane K Bauer
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Impact of automatic adjustment of stimulation outputs on pacemaker longevity in a new dual-chamber pacing system.

Authors:  Christiane Brockes; Mariette Rahn-Schönbeck; Firat Duru; Reto Candinas; Marko Turina
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Automatic capture verification in pacemakers (autocapture)--utility and problems.

Authors:  Ruth Kam
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2004-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.