Literature DB >> 12629599

Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.

Anthony M DiGioia1, Anton Y Plakseychuk, Timothy J Levison, Branislav Jaramaz.   

Abstract

This prospective study compares a mini-incision technique and traditional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thirty-three patients who had undergone a mini-incision THA were matched by diagnosis, gender, average age, and preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) to 33 patients who had undergone THA using the traditional posterior approach. The average length of the incision for group 1 was 11.7 cm (range, 7.3-13.0) and for group 2 was 20.2 cm (range, 14.8-26.0). At the 3-month follow-up, patients in the mini-incision group had significant improvement in limp (P<.05) and ability to climb stairs (P <.01) compared with the traditional group. At the 6 month follow-up, the mini-incision group was significantly better in terms of limp (P <.05), distance walked (P<.001), and stairs (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups for pain, function, or range of motion at the 1-year follow-up examination. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12629599     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  51 in total

1.  Evidence of reduced muscle trauma through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach by means of MRI.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Stephan Tohtz; Marc Dewey; Ivonne Springer; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Anatomic mapping of short external rotators shows the limit of their preservation during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ito; Isao Matsushita; Hiroki Watanabe; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tibor Schuster; Michael Wörner; Thomas Kalteis; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  No strength or gait benefit of two-incision THA: a brief followup at 1 year.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Mark W Pagnano; Krista Coleman Wood; R Michael Meneghini; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Transgluteal mini-incision. Technique and our own results].

Authors:  A Roth; F Layher; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach].

Authors:  M Rittmeister; A Peters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Minimally invasive approach to implantation of a hip endoprosthesis].

Authors:  R Wetzel; M Dorsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Repantis; T Bouras; P Korovessis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

9.  Which is more invasive-mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  T Shitama; T Kiyama; M Naito; K Shiramizu; G Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.