Literature DB >> 16642380

[Transgluteal mini-incision. Technique and our own results].

A Roth1, F Layher, R-A Venbrocks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A transgluteal mini-incision technique according to the approach of Bauer et al. is described.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Altogether 194 patients were supplied with a cementless primary total hip endoprosthesis using this approach. Our own results regarding ASA, body mass index, operation time, transfusions, the course of the Hb values, and the use of drugs against pain are described.
RESULTS: The approach does not show any dependence on ASA and BMI. Operation time, blood loss, and use of drugs against pain are not influenced by it. Angled reamers and impactors are mandatory to prevent additional damage of soft tissue. The cosmetic benefit seems to be the only advantage. The approach cannot be recommended for general use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16642380     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0967-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centring.

Authors:  T G Goergen; D Resnick
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Minimally invasive THR using two incisions.

Authors:  Richard A Berger
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  [A posterior mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty -- results of 76 consecutive cases].

Authors:  M Rittmeister; A Peters
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

4.  Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.

Authors:  Anthony M DiGioia; Anton Y Plakseychuk; Timothy J Levison; Branislav Jaramaz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The transgluteal approach to the hip joint.

Authors:  R Bauer; F Kerschbaumer; S Poisel; W Oberthaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1979-10

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter.

Authors:  Justin de Beer; Danielle Petruccelli; Paul Zalzal; Mitchell J Winemaker
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Porous coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty: 5- to 10-year follow up.

Authors:  W E Yang; C H Shih
Journal:  Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  1998-12

9.  The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; Paul J Duwelius
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision.

Authors:  Fujio Higuchi; Masafumi Gotoh; Noboru Yamaguchi; Ritsu Suzuki; Yoshifumi Kunou; Kazuo Ooishi; Kensei Nagata
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evidence of reduced muscle trauma through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach by means of MRI.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Stephan Tohtz; Marc Dewey; Ivonne Springer; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Muscle trauma in primary total hip arthroplasty depending on age, BMI, and surgical approach: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach].

Authors:  M Müller; S Tohtz; M Dewey; I Springer; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.