BACKGROUND: Using comprehensive gait analysis and strength testing, we previously investigated the early (2-month) functional outcome after THA using two-incision and mini-posterior surgical approaches and found an advantage for the mini-posterior approach. Benefits included improved muscle strength, a less antalgic gait, and better hip function as reflected by changes in hip moments during level walking and stair climbing. We questioned how these differences in function would fare with longer followup. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether the observed early functional advantages for the mini-posterior technique over the two-incision technique were still present 1 year postoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 22 patients with primary degenerative arthritis of the hip; of these, 21 completed gait and strength testing at 2 months, and 19 completed comprehensive gait and strength testing at 1 year (11 two-incision hips, eight mini-posterior hips). The 19 patients included 11 men and eight women with a mean age of 65 years (range, 40-85 years) and a mean (BMI) of 29 (range, 21-39). RESULTS: At 1 year postoperatively, the patients who had the mini-posterior THA had greater improvement in hip flexion strength and internal rotation strength, greater increase in hip flexor internal moment, and greater increase in single-leg stance time on level ground over the patients who had the two-incision THA. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the two-incision approach, patients undergoing mini-posterior THA had persistently better function, including hip flexor and internal rotator muscle strength, hip flexor internal moment, and single-leg stance during level walking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Using comprehensive gait analysis and strength testing, we previously investigated the early (2-month) functional outcome after THA using two-incision and mini-posterior surgical approaches and found an advantage for the mini-posterior approach. Benefits included improved muscle strength, a less antalgic gait, and better hip function as reflected by changes in hip moments during level walking and stair climbing. We questioned how these differences in function would fare with longer followup. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether the observed early functional advantages for the mini-posterior technique over the two-incision technique were still present 1 year postoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 22 patients with primary degenerative arthritis of the hip; of these, 21 completed gait and strength testing at 2 months, and 19 completed comprehensive gait and strength testing at 1 year (11 two-incision hips, eight mini-posterior hips). The 19 patients included 11 men and eight women with a mean age of 65 years (range, 40-85 years) and a mean (BMI) of 29 (range, 21-39). RESULTS: At 1 year postoperatively, the patients who had the mini-posterior THA had greater improvement in hip flexion strength and internal rotation strength, greater increase in hip flexor internal moment, and greater increase in single-leg stance time on level ground over the patients who had the two-incision THA. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the two-incision approach, patients undergoing mini-posterior THA had persistently better function, including hip flexor and internal rotator muscle strength, hip flexor internal moment, and single-leg stance during level walking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: G M Whatling; H V Dabke; C A Holt; L Jones; J Madete; P M Alderman; P Roberts Journal: Proc Inst Mech Eng H Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 1.617
Authors: Lawrence D Dorr; Aditya V Maheshwari; William T Long; Zhinian Wan; Leigh Ellen Sirianni Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kirsten L Poehling-Monaghan; Atul F Kamath; Michael J Taunton; Mark W Pagnano Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Dana L Judd; Joshua D Winters; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Cory L Christiansen Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Dana L Judd; Douglas A Dennis; Abbey C Thomas; Pamela Wolfe; Michael R Dayton; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.176