Literature DB >> 12620116

Myriads of protein families, and still counting.

Victor Kunin1, Ildefonso Cases, Anton J Enright, Victor de Lorenzo, Christos A Ouzounis.   

Abstract

From the historical record of genome sequencing, we show that the rate of discovery of new families has remained constant over time, indicating that our knowledge of sequence space is far from complete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12620116      PMCID: PMC151299          DOI: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-2-401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol        ISSN: 1474-7596            Impact factor:   13.583


With the advent of genome projects, the number of proteins has increased exponentially. We have analyzed the historical record of the discovery of 56,667 protein families encompassing 311,256 proteins from 83 complete genomes (available as of 28 May 2002). Our findings show that the rate of discovery of new families has remained constant over time, indicating that our knowledge of sequence space is far from complete. A decade ago, it was proposed that there might be a limited number of protein families and folds [1]. Ever since, the expectation has been that the discovery of new proteins will eventually slow down with better sampling of protein space through genome sequencing [2,3]. With a multitude of complete genomes, it is now possible to assess the extent of this notion by examining the rate of protein family discovery. To achieve this, we have clustered all protein sequences from all 83 complete genomes, using the TRIBE-MCL algorithm [4]. The resulting clusters represent sequence families with common functional properties and are tighter than structure-defined families or folds [4]. For each family, we recorded the first sequenced genome in which it appears for the first time (the 'founder' genome). We then counted the number of new families each genome sequence has contributed at the moment of its release. Remarkably, the number of families is increasing steadily with each new sequenced genome (Figure 1). This result contradicts the belief that the exploration of protein space is reaching saturation. In fact, it reflects the consistent reporting of unique proteins in almost every publication of a new genome [5].
Figure 1

The number of unique protein families accumulated from genome projects. Families were obtained by clustering proteins from complete genomes with the TRIBE-MCL algorithm (inflation value 1.1). Species with the largest contributions are indicated. All data and supplementary information are available at [9].

The number of unique protein families accumulated from genome projects. Families were obtained by clustering proteins from complete genomes with the TRIBE-MCL algorithm (inflation value 1.1). Species with the largest contributions are indicated. All data and supplementary information are available at [9]. According to our data, the rate of protein family discovery continues to be constant over time (correlation coefficient with the genome sequencing order is R2 > 0.98). Although the major leaps have been produced by eukaryotic genomes, which contributed a third of new protein families, diversity cannot only be attributed to eukaryotes. When only the Bacteria and the Archaea are considered, the trait of a constant rate for novel families is even more pronounced (correlation coefficient R2 > 0.99), suggesting that the exploration of prokaryotic diversity using genome sequencing is far from reaching completion. What are the major contributors of novel protein families? When normalized by the number of families per genome, the phylogenetic position of the corresponding organism is crucial. The leading contributions come from Haemophilus influenzae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans, representing the first bacterial, eukaryotic and metazoan genomes sequenced, respectively. In contrast, the smallest contributions come from multiple strains of already sequenced species. While a thorough analysis of all these families is ongoing, some general trends can already be inferred. We have observed a great variability of family sizes, ranging from one to over 2,000 members. Although most of the largest families were already found in the very first genomes that had been sequenced, the reverse, that the earliest-found families have proved to be the largest, is not true (Figure 2). Some of the earliest families have remained very small. Of the 1,175 families founded by the first cellular genome sequenced, that of Haemophilus influenzae, 215 contain fewer than 10 members, seven years and 82 sequenced genomes later. On the contrary, newer families are generally smaller, with the exception of families founded by large genomes with a significant degree of paralogy, such as that of Arabidopsis thaliana. Thus, it is very difficult to predict how new families will develop as more complete genomes become available. In fact, family size is more related to phylogenetic distribution than to the time of the family's discovery, supporting the notion that the phylogenetic distribution of proteins ranges from universal to strain-specific [6]. While the size of universal families increases with every new genome available, taxon-specific families might grow only when a close relative to the founder genome is sequenced.
Figure 2

Size distribution of protein families in relation to the time of their discovery. The x-axis represents the time of discovery of the founding member of a family; the y-axis represents frequency (on a logarithmic scale); each circle represents the number of protein families corresponding to the value on the y-axis; and the area of each circle corresponds to family size. It is notable that some of the largest families were founded early, but large families are still being discovered. Recently discovered small families (upper right) are expected to grow with better sampling of protein space.

Size distribution of protein families in relation to the time of their discovery. The x-axis represents the time of discovery of the founding member of a family; the y-axis represents frequency (on a logarithmic scale); each circle represents the number of protein families corresponding to the value on the y-axis; and the area of each circle corresponds to family size. It is notable that some of the largest families were founded early, but large families are still being discovered. Recently discovered small families (upper right) are expected to grow with better sampling of protein space. Although there are important reasons why a genome might be sequenced other than just to cover protein-sequence space [7], the contribution of new protein families can also be normalized by genome size, roughly representing the corresponding sequencing effort. From this viewpoint, the human genome has added only 1.3 new families per megabase, although this may be an underestimate given the uncertainty surrounding the total number of genes [8]. This number compares unfavorably to an average of 172 new families per megabase over all organisms, or to species such as Xylella fastidiosa and Borrelia burgdorferi with 380 new families per megabase each. In conclusion, the constant growth rate for new protein families suggests that protein-sequence space remains largely unexplored. Sampling biological diversity through genome sequencing will continue to produce vast amounts of novel protein families with interesting biochemical properties.
  8 in total

1.  Finding families for genomic ORFans.

Authors:  D Fischer; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families.

Authors:  A J Enright; S Van Dongen; C A Ouzounis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Microbial genomes: dealing with diversity.

Authors:  Y Boucher; C L Nesbø; W F Doolittle
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  Completeness in structural genomics.

Authors:  D Vitkup; E Melamud; J Moult; C Sander
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-06

5.  Estimating the human gene count.

Authors:  Mark J Daly
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Biodiversity: microbial genomes multiply.

Authors:  Russell F Doolittle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist.

Authors:  C Chothia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-06-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Genome sequences and great expectations.

Authors:  I Iliopoulos; S Tsoka; M A Andrade; P Janssen; B Audit; A Tramontano; A Valencia; C Leroy; C Sander; C A Ouzounis
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 13.583

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  The ORFanage: an ORFan database.

Authors:  Naomi Siew; Yaniv Azaria; Daniel Fischer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Protein families and TRIBES in genome sequence space.

Authors:  Anton J Enright; Victor Kunin; Christos A Ouzounis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Universal sharing patterns in proteomes and evolution of protein fold architecture and life.

Authors:  Gustavo Caetano-Anollés; Derek Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  A limited universe of membrane protein families and folds.

Authors:  Amit Oberai; Yungok Ihm; Sanguk Kim; James U Bowie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Computational prediction of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Lucy Skrabanek; Harpreet K Saini; Gary D Bader; Anton J Enright
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  A new evaluation of our life-support system.

Authors:  Ariane Toussaint; Jean-Marc Ghigo; George P C Salmond
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Nature of the protein universe.

Authors:  Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The evolutionary origin of orphan genes.

Authors:  Diethard Tautz; Tomislav Domazet-Lošo
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life.

Authors:  Supratim Mukherjee; Rekha Seshadri; Neha J Varghese; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Markus Göker; R Cameron Coates; Michalis Hadjithomas; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; David Paez-Espino; Yasuo Yoshikuni; Axel Visel; William B Whitman; George M Garrity; Jonathan A Eisen; Philip Hugenholtz; Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Tanja Woyke; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  ActDES - a curated Actinobacterial Database for Evolutionary Studies.

Authors:  Jana K Schniete; Nelly Selem-Mojica; Anna S Birke; Pablo Cruz-Morales; Iain S Hunter; Francisco Barona-Gomez; Paul A Hoskisson
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2021-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.