Literature DB >> 11373627

Completeness in structural genomics.

D Vitkup1, E Melamud, J Moult, C Sander.   

Abstract

Structural genomics has the goal of obtaining useful, three-dimensional models of all proteins by a combination of experimental structure determination and comparative model building. We evaluate different strategies for optimizing information return on effort. The strategy that maximizes structural coverage requires about seven times fewer structure determinations compared with the strategy in which targets are selected at random. With a choice of reasonable model quality and the goal of 90% coverage, we extrapolate the estimate of the total effort of structural genomics. It would take approximately 16,000 carefully selected structure determinations to construct useful atomic models for the vast majority of all proteins. In practice, unless there is global coordination of target selection, the total effort will likely increase by a factor of three. The task can be accomplished within a decade provided that selection of targets is highly coordinated and significant funding is available.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11373627     DOI: 10.1038/88640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Biol        ISSN: 1072-8368


  95 in total

Review 1.  Structural genomics: an approach to the protein folding problem.

Authors:  G T Montelione
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Streptococcus pneumonia YlxR at 1.35 A shows a putative new fold.

Authors:  J Osipiuk; P Górnicki; L Maj; I Dementieva; R Laskowski; A Joachimiak
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2001-10-25

3.  MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models.

Authors:  Ursula Pieper; Narayanan Eswar; Ashley C Stuart; Valentin A Ilyin; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  SUPFAM--a database of potential protein superfamily relationships derived by comparing sequence-based and structure-based families: implications for structural genomics and function annotation in genomes.

Authors:  Shashi B Pandit; Dilip Gosar; S Abhiman; S Sujatha; Sayali S Dixit; Natasha S Mhatre; R Sowdhamini; N Srinivasan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Structural genomics: a pipeline for providing structures for the biologist.

Authors:  Mark R Chance; Anne R Bresnick; Stephen K Burley; Jian-Sheng Jiang; Christopher D Lima; Andrej Sali; Steven C Almo; Jeffrey B Bonanno; John A Buglino; Simon Boulton; Hua Chen; Narayanan Eswar; Guoshun He; Raymond Huang; Valentin Ilyin; Linda McMahan; Ursula Pieper; Soumya Ray; Marc Vidal; Li Kai Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Fine-tuning function: correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse; Christopher Larson; B Montgomery Pettitt; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Structural characterization of the human proteome.

Authors:  Arne Müller; Robert M MacCallum; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  More for less in structural genomics.

Authors:  A Heger; L Holm
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

10.  Coordinating the impact of structural genomics on the human α-helical transmembrane proteome.

Authors:  Ursula Pieper; Avner Schlessinger; Edda Kloppmann; Geoffrey A Chang; James J Chou; Mark E Dumont; Brian G Fox; Petra Fromme; Wayne A Hendrickson; Michael G Malkowski; Douglas C Rees; David L Stokes; Michael H B Stowell; Michael C Wiener; Burkhard Rost; Robert M Stroud; Raymond C Stevens; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.