Literature DB >> 17416814

Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study.

Y Hatakeyama1, S Kakeda, N Ohnari, J Moriya, N Oda, K Nishino, W Miyamoto, Y Korogi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Compared with image intensifier television (I.I.-TV) system, an angiography system using the flat panel detector (FPD) of direct conversion type has a high spatial resolution, which may improve image quality, reduce patient exposure, or both. Our purpose was to evaluate the detection of simulated aneurysmal blebs under dose reduction with the FPD system in comparison with the I.I.-TV system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vascular phantom was designed to simulate various intracranial aneurysms with and without blebs, and this phantom was filled with 3 different concentrations of contrast material (300, 150, and 100 mg I/mL). 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) at low-dose mode of FPD system was compared with 2D DSA at a standard-dose mode of FPD system and a conventional mode of I.I.-TV system. Data analysis was based on 171 observations (57 aneurysms [20 with bleb and 37 without bleb] x 3 contrast material concentrations) by each of 7 radiologists, and the detection performances of blebs were compared using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The mean dose measurements with a phantom during 2D DSA were 0.36 mGy/frame with low-dose mode of FPD system, 0.72 mGy/frame with standard-dose mode of FPD system and 0.76 mGy/frame with I.I.-TV system. The mean Az at 100 mg I/mL was significantly higher for low-dose mode of FPD than for conventional-dose mode of I.I.-TV mean Az, 0.85 versus 0.56; P < .01), though differences were not significant with 150 and 300 mg I/mL between both systems.
CONCLUSION: The FPD system allows a considerable dose reduction during 2D DSA without loss of the image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17416814      PMCID: PMC7977368     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  24 in total

1.  Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system.

Authors:  M Spahn; M Strotzer; M Völk; S Böhm; B Geiger; G Hahm; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.

Authors:  M Strotzer; M Völk; T Wild; P von Landenberg; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part II: skin dose.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Patricia E Cole; Hollington T Lu; Alejandro Berenstein; Robin Albert; Beth A Schueler; Jeffrey D Georgia; Patrick T Noonan; Eric J Russell; Tim W Malisch; Robert L Vogelzang; Michael Geisinger; John F Cardella; James St George; George L Miller; Jon Anderson
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: a photoinduced discharge readout method for digital mammography.

Authors:  J A Rowlands; D M Hunter; N Araj
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.

Authors:  M Strotzer; J Gmeinwieser; M Völk; R Fründ; J Seitz; C Manke; H Albrich; S Feuerbach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiologic skin dose: tube position rotation and supplemental beam filtration.

Authors:  A M Norbash; D Busick; M P Marks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Characterization of the veiling glare PSF in x-ray image intensified fluoroscopy.

Authors:  J A Seibert; O Nalcioglu; W W Roeck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure.

Authors:  W Huda; K R Peters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  J Beck; S Rohde; M el Beltagy; M Zimmermann; J Berkefeld; V Seifert; A Raabe
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  6 in total

1.  Role of neuroradiology in evaluating cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  A Stafa; M Leonardi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.

Authors:  Meike Weis; Claudia Hagelstein; Theo Diehm; Stefan O Schoenberg; K Wolfgang Neff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-02

3.  Feasibility of ultra-low radiation dose digital subtraction angiography: Preliminary study in a simplified cerebral angiography phantom.

Authors:  Jun Young Maeng; Yunsun Song; Yu Sub Sung; Tae-Il Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Tae-Hyung Kim
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Intravenous flat-detector CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke management.

Authors:  Raphaël Blanc; Silvia Pistocchi; Drazenko Babic; Bruno Bartolini; Michaël Obadia; Sonia Alamowitch; Michel Piotin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  A comparison between magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Teslas (time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced) and flat-panel digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of embolized brain aneurysms.

Authors:  Guilherme S Nakiri; Antonio C Santos; Thiago G Abud; Davi C Aragon; Benedicto O Colli; Daniel G Abud
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Transradial access for pediatric teenage neurointervention: A single-center case series.

Authors:  Pablo Cox; Rodrigo Riveros; Francisco Torres; Alejandro Venegas; Yuri Carvajal
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 1.764

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.